Archive
February, 2020 Monthly archive

Nortriptyline (Pamelor) is a tricyclic antidepressant approved by the FDA only for the treatment of depression. However, with the introduction of SSRI family of antidepressants such as fluoxetine (Prozac) which have fewer side effects, the use of tricyclic antidepressants for depression has declined.

Tricyclic antidepressants are still in wide use, but mostly for the treatment of headaches and pain. Nortriptyline is very similar to amitriptyline (Elavil) and is thought to cause fewer and milder side effects, although this has not been proven. This could be due to the fact that amitriptyline is broken down into nortriptyline, which is the active metabolite. Amitriptyline tends to be more sedating, which can be useful in patients with insomnia.

There are no good blinded studies of nortriptyline for the prevention of migraines and they are not likely to be done. We assume it is as good as amitriptyline, although studies of amitriptyline also lack in size and scientific rigor.

There are many trials of amitriptyline and nortriptyline for various pain conditions, but they are also not up to our modern standards. Amitriptyline was approved in the US in 1961.

Besides sedation, nortriptyline can cause dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention in older patients, and other side effects. The dose to treat migraines and pain is usually lower than the dose used to treat depression. Pain and headaches sometimes respond to as little as 10 or 25 mg while for depression, the dose goes up to 100 mg and higher.

In short-term studies of major depression, antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thinking and behavior in children, adolescents, and young adults. This is less likely to occur when treating pain, but many pain patients also experience depression.

Read More

Eptienzumab (Vyepti) was just approved by the FDA for the preventive treatment of migraine headaches. Eptinezumab is another monoclonal antibody that blocks the effect of CGRP, a chemical released during a migraine attack. It joins erenumab (Aimovig), fremanezumab (Ajovy), and galcanezumab (Emgality), three other monoclonal antibodies approved for the preventive treatment of migraine headaches.

Eptinezumab is different from the other three drugs in that it is administered intravenously. It is given every three months by an infusion over 30 minutes. The other three drugs are self-administered subcutaneously every month, although fremaezumab can be also given every 3 months.

Eptinezumab may also have a faster onset of action because it is administered intravenously and quickly reaches its peak concentration in the blood. The other three drugs take up to a week to reach their maximum concentration. The reason for such a long delay (most drugs injected subcutaneously take less than an hour to peak) is that the monoclonal antibodies are large molecules and are distributed not by blood vessels, but the slow-moving lymphatic system. On the other hand, these are preventive therapies, so the speed of onset is less critical than for abortive drugs, such as NSAIDs, triptans, and gepants (ubrogepant, rimegepant).

Theoretically, it is possible that eptinezumab could work for patients who do not respond to the other three drugs because of a better distribution of the drug and because these drugs are not identical. About 10% of my patients report significantly better response when switched from erenumab, which was first to be approved, to either fremanezumab or galcanezumab.

We don’t know yet what the drug will cost and how well the insurance companies will pay for it. All three subcutaneous drugs cost about $650 a shot and all three manufacturers offer a one-year free trial if the insurance refuses to pay. This does not apply to patients who have Medicare or Medicaid, which do not allow free trials or discount coupons. Fortunately, more and more insurers, including the government plans, are covering these drugs, albeit with some paperwork that needs to be completed by the doctor. The cost of eptinezumab will consist of two parts – the cost of the drug and the cost of the infusion.

Read More

A group of American and Chinese researchers reported an objective way to diagnose migraine headaches using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The paper just published in Neurology used machine learning to examine differences between the brains of migraine sufferers, patients with chronic pain, and healthy controls.

MRI scans of migraine patients typically show normal brain structure. fMRI scans can visualize connections between different parts of the brain, or so-called connectome. The researchers discovered abnormal functional connectivity within the visual, default mode, sensorimotor, and frontal-parietal networks that allowed them to distinguish migraineurs from healthy controls with 93% sensitivity and 89% specificity. They verified the specificity of this diagnostic marker with new groups of migraineurs and patients with other chronic pain disorders (chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia) and demonstrated 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity for discriminating migraineurs from nonmigraineurs. They also found that the changes in the marker correlated with the changes in headache frequency in response to real acupuncture.

If confirmed, these findings could offer a very accurate way to diagnose migraine, rather than relying on subjective clinical description. This test could also allow for an objective way to test various new treatments. Because of the cost of fMRIs, it will be a long time before it becomes a routine clinical test. It is also possible that genetic testing and testing of blood samples for biochemical markers will lead to other accurate diagnostic tests and tests to predict responses to various therapies.

Read More
Acupuncture has been subjected to a very large number of clinical trials for a variety of conditions, including migraine headaches. Dr. Zhang, a neurologist at Stanford and two of his colleagues have published a review of trials that compared acupuncture with standard pharmacological migraine therapy.The review included only scientifically rigorous trials that compared the efficacy of acupuncture with a standard migraine preventive medication in adult patients with a diagnosis of chronic or episodic migraine with or without aura.

Out of the 706 published reports, 7 clinical trials, with a total of 1430 participants were of high quality. Modes of acupuncture and pharmacological treatments varied from trial to trial, which made it difficult to make any sweeping conclusions. However, several of the studies showed acupuncture to be more effective than the standard pharmacological treatments for migraine prevention.

Even if acupuncture is only as effective as drugs, its safety makes it a superior choice. The major drawbacks of acupuncture are that it is time-consuming and relatively expensive when compared to generic prescription drugs. These are the reasons why I rarely perform acupuncture on my patients. If someone is interested in acupuncture, I do encourage them to try it and refer them to well-trained lower-cost non-physician providers.

 

Read More

Nebivolol (Bystolic) is one of the newer, third generation beta-blockers, drugs used for the treatment of high blood pressure as well as migraine headaches. In Europe, it’s been in use for over 20 years.

In addition to beta-blockade, it may have additional beneficial effects on endothelium (blood vessel lining). It may also improve glucose metabolism by improving insulin sensitivity and other functions.

Nebivolol has the advantage of having fewer side effects than other beta blockers. including lower rates of fatigue and shortness of breath.

The majority of migraine sufferers are young women, many of who have low blood pressure, which predisposes them to side effects from beta blockers.

However, in the US, nebivolol is relatively expensive ($160 for one month supply) since it is not yet available in a generic form. Many insurers will not pay for it unless the patient cannot tolerate the widely used and inexpensive beta blockers such as propranolol, metoprolol, or atenolol.

Read More

Lasmiditan (Rayvow) is the first (and probably the last) drug in the class of ditans. Just like the triptans (sumatriptan or Imitrex and other), it works through the serotonin system. However, it activates 5-HT1F serotonin receptor, while triptans activate 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors. This confers an advantage in that lasmiditan does not cause constriction of coronary arteries, which can happen with triptans . So patients with a history of a heart attack, angina or multiple risk factors for vascular disease who could not take triptans, now have another drug that is safe to use. The first acute migraine drug for this at-risk population, ubrogepant (Ubrelvy) became available a week ago. Lasmiditan will reach pharmacies in the next few days.

I will also prescribe lasmiditan to patients for whom triptans and ubrogepant are ineffective, partially effective, or cause side effects, which constitutes a sizable minority of my patients. .

Results of two large double-blind trials showed that 28-39% of patients achieved fast and complete elimination of migraine pain at two hours with lasmiditan as compared to 15% and 21% with placebo. 41-49% of patients achieved freedom from their most bothersome symptom of sensitivity to light, sensitivity to sound, or nausea at two hours with lasmiditan compared to 30% and 33% with placebo.

Lasmiditan is available in 50 mg and 100 mg tablets and the recommended dose is 50, 100, or 200 mg taken once a day.

Side effects were generally mild to moderate and the most frequent ones included dizziness, fatigue, tingling, drowsiness, nausea, and muscle weakness. Two driving studies showed that lasmiditan may cause significant driving impairment.

Lasmiditan is a non-narcotic medication, has low abuse potential and no evidence of physical dependence. It is a controlled substance but is in category 5, which indicates the lowest level of potential risk of abuse.

Read More