Archive
Chronic migraine

Researchers in Cincinnati, OH led by Dr. Andrew Hershey reviewed information about the diagnosis, headache features, medication overuse, functional disability in a group of 1,170 children and adolescents with continuous headaches. They compared patients given the diagnosis of chronic migraine with those who were diagnosed as having new daily persistent headache.

The mean age was 14 and 79% of the group were girls. The authors reported that “The overwhelming majority of these youth had headaches with migrainous features, regardless of their clinical diagnosis. Most youth with continuous headache experienced severe migraine-related functional disability, regardless of diagnostic subgroup.”

They concluded that “Overall, youth with continuous chronic migraine and new daily persistent headache did not have clinically meaningful differences in headache features and associated disability. Findings suggest that chronic migraine and new daily persistent headache may be variants of the same underlying disease.”

Here is my take on NDPH adapted from the soon-to-be-released book, The End of Migraine: 150 Ways to Stop Your Pain:

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is one of the dozens of types of headaches listed in the classification of headaches. This particular listing causes more harm than good. NDPH is defined by the single fact that the headache begins on a certain day and persists without a break. The classification says that NDPH may have features suggestive of either migraine or tension-type headache.

There are no parallels to NDPH in medicine. There is no new daily persistent asthma, or new daily persistent colitis, or any other “new daily” disease.

There does not appear to be any justification for having NDPH as a distinct condition. It does not have a typical clinical presentation and it has not led to any research or treatment. When you search for this condition on the internet, you will not find any effective treatment for it. The suffering of many patients is magnified by the loss of hope, worsening depression, and flagging will to live.

Most importantly, some patients with NDPH do respond to treatment. According to anecdotal reports and in my experience, Botox injections, intravenous magnesium, preventive drugs for migraines, and other treatments can be effective.

Read More

This is a common question I get from patients. Botox was first approved by the FDA in 1989. The CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), in 2018. Long-term safety of Botox is well established. I’ve treated many pregnant women, children as young as 8, and one patient who reached 100. Botox acts locally and has no systemic effects. It means that it cannot affect your kidneys, liver, heart, or any other organ. Injections of CGRP mAbs appear to be safer than most old medications taken by mouth. But they do have some systemic side effects and we don’t know if there are any long-term side effects. We have some 5-year safety data but only in a small number of patients. We will know more in a few years, after these drugs have been in use in a large population of patients.

Long-term safety is the main reason why I recommend trying Botox before mAbs.

Another reason to prefer Botox was presented at the 62nd annual meeting of the American Headache Society. It was conducted by Allergan, the manufacturer of Botox, so bias could be a factor. They looked at a relatively large number of patients – 1,976. Of these, 333 (17%) were treated with Botox first. Another 1134 (57%) were started on erenumab (Aimovig), 298 (15%) initiated fremanezumab (Ajovy), and 211 (11%) started galcanezumab (Emgality). More patients (75%) who were started on Botox were still receiving it 6 months later compared to patients who were first given a CGRP mAb (erenumab: 47%; fremanezumab: 55%; galcanezumab: 45%).

Not all of my patients begin with Botox. Some prefer mAbs because they don’t like the idea of having multiple injections over their face and head. Others cannot obtain insurance coverage for Botox. During COVID, some patients were reluctant to come to the office for Botox injections and they preferred to start a mAb at home. Three of the four available mAbs can be self-administered. The fourth one, eptinezumab (Vyepti) is given intravenously every 3 months.

Read More

Zonisamide (Zonegran) is an epilepsy drug similar to topiramate in its mechanism of action. Unfortunately, it shares its side effects as well. These include fatigue, difficulty with concentration and memory, nausea, and other. However, because they are not identical drugs, some patients tolerate zonisamide better than topiramate.

One study showed that 44% of 172 patients who did not respond to topiramate did respond to zonisamide with 13% having an excellent response. A similar study in 63 patients who did not respond to topiramate also showed benefit from zonisamide as did 34 patients in another study. Zonisamide also helped 8 out of 12 children who did not respond to other medications.

The dose of zonisamide ranges from 50 to 400 mg a day, but most patients need 100-200 mg.

Read More

Cefaly is a neurostimulation device that was approved by the FDA in 2014. Until October of this year, it required a prescription. Several clinical trials proved the device to be not only effective but also very safe. Now it can be purchased without a prescription from the manufacturer’s website – Cefaly.com.

Cefaly is used for both prevention and acute treatment of migraine. It is applied to the middle of the lower forehead with an adhesive electrode. For acute therapy, the device is used for 60 minutes. For prevention, it is used daily for 20 minutes. Some of my patients find it effective on its own while others use it in conjunction with medications.

As far as side effects, the device is very safe. It can cause skin irritation from the adhesive or from the electrical current. Some of my patients reported worsening of their headaches. This tends to happen to patients who develop allodynia during their migraine attack. Allodynia means increased skin sensitivity. It can be so severe that sometimes a patient cannot even wear glasses or have a ponytail.

An electrical stimulation device that is better tolerated by patients with allodynia is Nerivio. It is applied to the upper arm for 45 minutes as needed. Nerivio requires a prescription but it is sometimes covered by insurance while Cefaly is not.

Read More

Zolmitriptan (Zomig, Zomig ZMT, Zomig NS) is one of seven triptans sold in the US. It is available in tablets, orally disintegrating tablets, and nasal spray. The nasal spray is approved for children 12 and older. Both tablets and the spray are available in 2.5 mg and 5 mg strength. The maximum daily dose is 10 mg.

However, it is washed out of the body within a few hours. This means that taking three 5 mg tablets spread out over 24 hours poses no danger. Three doses a day is the approved limit for rizatriptan (Maxalt). There is no reason why this should not apply to zolmitriptan and other triptans except for the long-lasting frovatriptan. Fortunately, it is uncommon that a patient requires three doses in one day. And if a patient does need to take a triptan more than twice a day, we usually try a different drug that may work with a single dose.

One advantage of the nasal spray is that it tends to have a faster onset of action. Another advantage is that can be taken when severe nausea or vomiting precludes the use of oral medications. My impression is that zolmitriptan spray is more effective than the original sumatriptan spray. The amount of fluid in a single dose of Zomig is less than that in sumatriptan and the spray droplets are of smaller size. This leads to better retention of fluid in the nasal passages and better absorption.

The new version of sumatriptan spray, Tosymra contains 10 mg of sumatriptan while the original spray contains 20 mg. However, it comes out in smaller droplets and contains an ingredient that allows for better absorption. This formulation of sumatriptan spray appears to be as effective as Zomig NS.

Zolmitriptan nasal spray is expensive (as is Tosymra) because it is available only as a branded product. It will lose its patent protection in 2021.

Read More

Verapamil (Calan, Isoptin) is an effective drug for the prevention of cluster headaches. It is sometimes used for migraines as well. However, the evidence for its efficacy is weak. A double-blind crossover trial by Dr. Glen Solomon and his colleagues in Ohio examined the effect of 320 mg of verapamil on 12 migraine patients. The drug was more effective than the placebo. Other small studies also suggested that it might help some patients.

Verapamil has a reputation among headache specialists as being effective for the prevention of frequent migraine auras and other neurological symptoms that occur with migraines. Unfortunately, there are no controlled trials to support this impression.

The starting dose of verapamil is 120 mg a day with a possible escalation up to 480 mg. For cluster headaches, the starting dose is 240 mg and the maximum dose is as high as 960 mg. Verapamil can cause arrhythmia (irregular heartbeat), especially at higher doses. I recommend an electrocardiogram before every increase of the dose above 240 mg.

The two most common side effects of verapamil are constipation and swelling of the feet. In some of my patients, constipation was severe and resistant to treatment. They had to stop taking the drug.

Read More

Venlafaxine (Effexor) is the first drug in the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) class. It was approved by the FDA for the treatment of depression in 1993.

At low doses, venlafaxine works as a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) such as fluoxetine (Prozac). SNRIs are considered to be effective for the treatment of pain and migraine headaches. SSRIs are not. A review of studies that involved a total of 418 patients showed that SNRIs are effective for the prevention of migraines. The class of SNRIs includes duloxetine (Cymbalta), desvenlafaxine (Pristiq), milnacipran (Savella), and levomilnacipran (Fetzima). Milnacipran is the only SNRI that is approved by the FDA for the treatment of fibromyalgia rather than depression.

In treating migraines, a 60-patient trial showed that the 150 mg dose is more effective than 75 mg.

Another double-blind crossover study comparing venlafaxine with amitriptyline showed them to be equally effective. Venlafaxine had fewer side effects than amitriptyline.

Venlafaxine is started at 37.5 or 75 mg dose. After a week or two, the dose is increased to 150 mg. The maximum daily dose of venlafaxine is 450 mg.

Potential side effects include insomnia, drowsiness, fatigue, nausea, dizziness, suicidal thoughts in depressed children and young adults, and others.

Just like with other SNRIs, sudden discontinuation of venlafaxine can cause withdrawal symptoms. These may include one or more of the following: dizziness, headache, nausea, diarrhea, paresthesia (pins-and-needles), irritability, vomiting, insomnia, anxiety, sweating, and fatigue. SNRIs are stopped after a slow and gradual reduction of the dose.

Read More

Tramadol (Ultram) is a mild narcotic (opioid) pain killer. Just like other opioids it is not a good choice to treat an acute migraine attack. Besides its addiction potential, it does not work well for most migraine patients, can cause nausea, and can lead to rebound or medication overuse headaches.

Tramadol is also available in combination with acetaminophen (Ultracet). This combination was tested in a study published in Headache, Tramadol/Acetaminophen for the Treatment of Acute Migraine Pain: Findings of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. 305 patients took tramadol/APAP (75 mg/650 mg) or placebo for a typical migraine with moderate or severe pain.

Subjects in the tramadol/APAP group were more likely than those in the placebo group to be pain-free at 2 hours (22% vs. 9%), 6 hours (43% vs. 25%), and 24 hours (53% vs. 38%)
Side effects caused by the active drug included nausea, dizziness, vomiting, and somnolence.

Tramadol alone or in combination with acetaminophen is worth trying only if the first-line classes of drugs are ineffective or contraindicated. These include NSAIDs, triptans, and gepants.

Read More

Timolol (Blocadren), is the second of the two beta-blockers approved by the FDA for both hypertension and the prevention of migraines. Among the dozen or so beta-blockers, it is not very popular for either hypertension or migraine. An ophthalmic solution of timolol is often used for glaucoma.

A study of 107 migraine patients compared prophylactic treatment with timolol, 20 to 30 mg per day with matching placebo. The study was a double-blind crossover study that lasted 20 weeks. Timolol was significantly better than the placebo in decreasing the frequency of headaches, numbers of patients who had a 50% reduction in headache frequency, global response, and patient preference. The overall response was 65% with timolol compared with 40% with placebo. The severity and duration of headaches that occurred were unchanged. Few side effects were reported with either timolol or placebo.

Another study compared timolol, 10 mg twice a day with propranolol, 80 mg twice a day, and with placebo in 83 migraine patients. Timolol and propranolol were equally effective and had a similar rate of side effects.

The side effects of timolol are typical of all beta-blockers – chest discomfort, tiredness, lightheadedness, dizziness, fainting, shortness of breath, slow or irregular heartbeat.

The usual dose of timolol is 10 mg twice a day.

You can read about the use of timolol eye drops to treat acute migraines in a previous post.

Read More

Acetyl-leucine (Tanganil) is an amino acid that has been available in France for over 60 years as a prescription drug. It is approved for the treatment of low blood pressure and dizziness. However, there are no published studies of this product for either low blood pressure or dizziness. There are some animal studies suggesting that acetyl-leucine works on brain cells responsible for the balancing of the body and motor control. It was also tested in animals whose inner ear balancing organ was destroyed on one side.

A group of German doctors, whom I know and respect, found it to be very effective in a prospective study of 10 patients with migraines. The dose was 5 grams daily. The usual recommended dose for dizziness and hypotension is up to 2 grams.

I occasionally recommend it to desperate patients with severe and persistent dizziness and vertigo that has resulted from a concussion or vestibular migraine.

While acetyl-leucine is not proven to be effective, it does not cause any side effects.

Acetyl-leucine is also being tested for some rare hereditary neurological disorders such as Niemann-Pick disease.

Read More

Naltrexone is similar to naloxone, a drug used to reverse the effect of narcotic (opioid) overdose. Naltrexone is not used to reverse the effect of an overdose, but to treat opioid and alcohol dependence. (LDN) and is given as a monthly injection or a daily pill. Naltrexone blocks the body’s own endogenous morphine (endorphin) receptors. In theory, this should make the pain worse. However, low-dose naltrexone (LDN) seems to have the opposite effect. It is possibly explained by the fact that a small amount of naltrexone blocks the endorphin receptors for a short time, during which the body begins to make more endorphins in an attempt to overcome this block. After the effect of naltrexone wears off, this extra amount of endorphins provides relief of pain and by blocking other receptors (such as Toll-like receptor 4) and reducing inflammation, potentially produces other beneficial effects, most of which are not scientifically proven.

Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) do seem to respond to LDN.

A study of 27 patients with chronic central pain syndromes at the Stanford Pain Management Clinic published in The Journal of Pain concluded that “The significant findings of decreased average pain scores and depression and improved physical function after prescribing this well-tolerated, inexpensive medication provides justification for larger, controlled trials in patients with central sensitivity syndromes.” Some of these central sensitivity syndromes include migraine, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic back pain, and other.

Naltrexone is available only in a 50-mg tablet, while LDN is started at 1.5 mg nightly for a week, then 3 mg nightly for a week, and then, 4.5 mg nightly. This regimen requires a compounding pharmacy to make capsules containing 1.5 mg for the first two weeks and then, capsules with 4.5 mg. Some of my patients went up as high as 9 mg nightly. Compounded drugs tend to be more expensive than factory-made generics but because naltrexone itself is cheap, the cost of 30 capsules can be as low as $50.

Because the dose is low, side effects are rare. These include vivid dreams and insomnia and if these occur, the medicine can be taken in the morning.

Read More

Having given Botox injections to thousands of patients, I know that some patients tolerate pain better if they curse during the procedure.

A British psychologist Richard Stephens seems to have made a career out of studying the effect of cursing on pain. His first paper Swearing as a response to pain, appeared in 2009 in NeuroReport. It showed that swearing improves pain tolerance in volunteers whose hand was submerged in icy water. His next paper, which I mentioned in a post in 2011, Swearing as a Response to Pain—Effect of Daily Swearing Frequency was published in The Journal of Pain.

In this study, Stephens looked at the effect of repeated daily swearing on experimental pain. The volunteers were again subjected to pain by submerging their hand into icy water. And they again showed that swearing reduces pain. However, people who tended to swear frequently throughout the day had less of a pain-relieving effect than those who did not.

His latest paper, Swearing as a Response to Pain: Assessing Hypoalgesic Effects of Novel “Swear” Words, was just published in the Frontiers in Psychology. The authors show that made-up “swear” words are not as effective as the good old four-letter f-word.

The conclusion of this 6,500-word research paper suggests that there is still a lot more swearing …er … I mean, studying to be done on this subject. Whether this is a good use of the British taxpayers’ money is another matter. Is the ultimate goal to save the British National Health Service money by replacing pain medications with scientifically validated swear words?

Read More