Archive
Headaches in children

Modern technology may help manage or even prevent pain before it becomes chronic. A recent study exploring the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on pain sensitivity offers some intriguing insights.

What is rTMS?

rTMS is a non-invasive method of brain stimulation. It involves sending magnetic pulses to specific areas of the brain through a coil placed on the scalp. This technique has been used to treat conditions like depression and chronic pain, but researchers are now looking at its potential to prevent pain. We used rTMS at the New York Headache Center to treat chronic migraine, other pain and neurological conditions that do not respond to usual treatment.

In a controlled experiment, researchers led by Nahian Chowdhury examined the role of rTMS in reducing future pain in healthy volunteers. The results were published in the latest issue of Pain, a journal of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

The subjects were divided into two groups:

Active rTMS Group: Received high-frequency rTMS to the area of the brain responsible for hand movements.

Sham rTMS Group: Received a fake treatment for comparison.

Both groups were then given an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) into their jaw muscles, which causes prolonged pain similar to temporomandibular disorders (TMD), a condition causing jaw pain and dysfunction.

Results:

Pain Reduction: Participants who received active rTMS reported significantly less pain when chewing or yawning than the sham group. This effect was more pronounced in the early stages after the injection but persisted for days and weeks.

Brain Activity: The study found an increase in what’s known as peak alpha frequency (PAF) after rTMS, which is linked to lower pain sensitivity.

What Does This Mean for Pain Management?

Preventive Potential: This research suggests that rTMS could be used prophylactically to reduce pain sensitivity when pain is expected, like before surgery.

Future Directions: While promising, this study opens the door to further research into how rTMS can be optimized for pain control, potentially exploring different frequencies, duration, and areas of stimulation.

Pre-Surgery: rTMS might be used to reduce postoperative pain, potentially preventing the transition to chronic pain.

Chronic Pain Management: For those already dealing with chronic pain, understanding how brain activity changes with rTMS could lead to more effective treatments.

Conclusion

While we are still in the early stages, this study of rTMS offers hope for pain sufferers. It suggests a future where we might not only treat pain more effectively but also prevent it from becoming a long-term problem. This could revolutionize our approach to pain management, making it less about reducing and enduring pain and more about preventing it from taking root in the first place.

Read More

It’s an honor to have contributed, alongside Andrew Blumenfeld and Sait Ashina, a chapter on Botox injections to the upcoming textbook Headache and Facial Pain Medicine. Edited by Sait Ashina of Harvard Medical School and published by McGraw Hill, the book is set for release in 2025 but is already available on Amazon.

The book includes chapters on Primary Headaches, Secondary Headaches, Facial Pain and Cranial Neuralgias, Special Treatments and Procedures, Special Populations, and Special Topics. It is an excellent textbook for health care providers.

Read More

Researchers at a hospital in Northern India reported good results in treating New Daily Persistent Headache (NDPH) with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

NDPH is a type of headache that begins suddenly and persists daily without specific features, distinct MRI presentation, or blood test abnormalities. It can present similarly to chronic migraines or chronic tension-type headaches. While published reports suggest NDPH is difficult to treat, this is often not the case. However, patients who do not respond to initial standard treatments may become discouraged.

The Indian researchers conducted a pilot study with 50 NDPH patients who received 10 Hz rTMS sessions on the left prefrontal cortex of the brain for three consecutive days. They found that after 4 weeks:

  • 70% of patients had at least a 50% reduction in headache severity

  • Patients gained an average of 11 headache-free days per month

  • 76% had significant improvements in headache-related disability

  • Depression and anxiety scores also improved significantly

The treatment was well-tolerated, with only minor side effects in a few patients. The benefits seemed especially pronounced in patients who had NDPH that resembled chronic migraine.

I never give the diagnosis of NDPH, but diagnose it as a condition it most resembles and treat the person with a wide variety of available options. Many respond. For those who do not, we offer rTMS, a procedure that uses magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain. An electromagnetic coil device is placed against the scalp near the forehead. The coil painlessly delivers a magnetic pulse that stimulates the brain with the goal of reducing headache symptoms. The FDA has approved it for the treatment of depression, anxiety, and OCD. We use it for various neurological conditions, including headaches that do not respond to standard therapies. To treat migraines and other types of pain, we usually stimulate not only the left prefrontal cortex, as was done in this study, but also two additional sites that have been reported to help with pain and migraines. These additional sites are either the motor cortex or the occipital cortex, on both sides.

Sometimes, we obtain a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan to better target rTMS. fMRI is a research procedure that is not available commercially (and is not covered by insurance).

Read More

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is approved by the FDA for the treatment of depression and anxiety. We have been using it to treat migraine headaches and other neurological conditions that are not responsive to standard therapies. Improvement in headaches and pain may be at least in part due to improvement in depression. However, additional mechanisms play a role since we see patients who are not depressed but whose pain improves with rTMS.

A new study by Chinese and Australian researchers published in Pain suggests that opioid mechanisms (endorphins, encephalin, and other peptides) may underlie the mechanism of pain relief produced by rTMS.

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 45 healthy participants were randomized into 3 groups: one receiving rTMS over the primary motor cortex (M), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), or sham stimulation. Experimental pain was induced by applying capsaicin (hot pepper extract) over the skin of the right hand followed by application of heat.

Participants received intravenous naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist) or saline before the first rTMS session to block or allow opioid effects, respectively. After 90 minutes to allow naloxone metabolism, participants received a second rTMS session.

For the M1 group, naloxone abolished the analgesic effects of the first rTMS session compared to saline. Pain relief returned in the second session after naloxone was washed out of the body. For the DLPFC group, only the second prolonged rTMS session induced significant analgesia in the saline condition compared to naloxone. rTMS over M1 selectively increased plasma ?-endorphin levels, while rTMS over DLPFC increased encephalin levels.

The results suggest that opioid mechanisms mediate rTMS-induced analgesia. The specific opioid peptides and rTMS dosage requirements differ between M1 and DLPFC stimulation.

However, these results are far from definitive. The study was small and the study protocol was complicated (e.g. using a double dose of rTMS to DLPFC), which increases the likelihood of an error. Also, these results apply to conditions of acute pain. In patients with chronic pain and headaches, rTMS likely provides relief by improving network connectivity between different parts of the brain.

 

Read More

A new study by Harvard researchers suggests that there is no connection between caffeine consumption and migraine headaches. I am not convinced. This study was small and had only 12 out of 97 participants consume 3-4 cups a day, while 65 consumed 1-2 cups and 20 consumed no caffeine. Statistics based on such small numbers are unreliable.

Most headache sufferers who drink large amounts of caffeine develop a caffeine-withdrawal headache when they don’t get their usual dose of caffeine on time.  My most dramatic case was that of a man who drank about 10 cups of coffee a day. He also set an alarm for 3 AM to have a cup of coffee. If he skipped that 3 AM cup, he would wake up with a debilitating migraine.

A double-blind caffeine withdrawal study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. It showed that 52% of people consuming an average of 2.5 cups of coffee developed a moderate or severe headache when caffeine was stopped.

Caffeine can play positive role in the treatment of migraine and tension-type headaches. It is considered to be an adjuvant analgesic and is included in over-the-counter and prescription drugs along with pain medications. It enhances pain relief produced by acetaminophen, aspirin, and other pain drugs.

The problem arises from excessive intake of caffeine. Two cups of coffee at breakfast, a cup of caffeinated soda at lunch, and a couple of Excedrin do not appear excessive until you consider the total amount of caffeine in these products. If you are prone to headaches, this amount may be sufficient to cause a headache, typically upon awakening in the morning.

 

Read More

Because of my research and publications on magnesium, I was contacted by Nutrisense. This company helps people without diabetes improve their diet and “metabolic health”. They are interested in educating people about the role of magnesium, a very underappreciated mineral. The company offered me a free 2-week trial of their continuous glucose monitor (CGM). I have a healthy diet and normal weight so I was not sure that I could get any useful information. But I thought that some of my patients could benefit and wanted to see what they would experience.

CGM did provide some interesting observations. After exercise, I gulped down 12 oz of unsweetened coconut water. My glucose went up to 150, the upper limit of what is considered normal. I ate a golden delicious apple for a snack one afternoon. Healthy, isn’t it? My glucose level shot up to 165. The next day, I went to a birthday party for a 3-year-old and ate two slices of pizza, without toppings. The glucose level went up to 164. Another night, I had some sushi. The level was 169 (sushi rice is always cooked with sugar). Then, after dinner out with my family, we decided to have ice cream. I had two scoops with the good excuse of wanting to see how high my glucose would go. Surprisingly, it went up only to 151.

It is well known that eating protein and fat first will slow down the absorption of carbohydrates. This is why an apple, eaten between meals gave me a higher spike in sugar than two scoops of ice cream I ate after dinner. Any liquid form of sugar gets absorbed fast. So, you may want to avoid sweet drinks, including fruit juices. I found that getting feedback from the CGM helped modify my eating habits, mostly for the better. I may be less inclined to avoid desserts after dinner. However, additional calories do make me gain weight, so I will try to control myself.

A few caveats. Whenever I slept on the side where my CGM was attached, the glucose level appeared to drop to dangerous levels. This incorrect reading happens when compression restricts blood flow to the monitor. Occasionally, when exercising, I felt a poke from the needle of the CGM. And, after two weeks, my skin became a bit irritated by the sticky bandage that covered the CGM.

I may recommend CGM to my patients who get migraines when they are hungry and to those who are looking for additional help in losing weight. In addition to getting direct feedback about the impact of food on their sugar levels and those levels on their migraines, some patients may benefit from a consultation with a dietitian. Nutrisense can connect you with a dietitian.

My reactions to various foods were normal. Hunger is not one of my migraine triggers. However, many people with migraines have reactive hypoglycemia – an exaggerated response to carbohydrates. This means that when the blood glucose level spikes after a carbohydrate-rich meal, too much insulin is produced, and the glucose level drops below normal. This can be a migraine trigger. Even if migraine is not triggered, this can also make you sluggish and less productive. Skipping meals is also a known migraine trigger and the mechanism is similar – your blood glucose drops too low. There is also a strong correlation between weight and migraines – the heavier you are the more migraines you get. Women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) are at a higher risk of having insulin resistance and developing diabetes.

The ideal diet is low in carbohydrates and high in protein. Three or four meals a day is the frequency that works best for most people. In general, the last meal should be at least two hours before bedtime. But there are exceptions.  For some, having a snack in the evening prevents morning or middle-of-the-night migraine.

Read More

We use a neuronavigation system from Soterix (on the left) for precise targeting of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). And we use the most advanced TMS machine from MagVenture (on the right) to treat chronic pain, migraines, fibromyalgia, and other neurological conditions.

Read More

Neurologists frequently find themselves managing patients resistant to standard treatments due to limited proven therapies for many neurological conditions. Some patients cannot tolerate or have contraindications to medications, particularly for such common disabling conditions like migraine and chronic pain. 

One promising treatment is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). It is a proven procedure for anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), smoking cessation, and acute migraines. TMS utilizes magnetic fields to stimulate nerve cells in the brain that are underactive or reduce the excitability of overactive cells. TMS can change the flow of information between different parts of the brain in various neurological conditions. Published reports show the potential benefit of TMS in fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, cluster headaches, facial pain, trigeminal and other neuralgias, back pain, insomnia, memory disorders, tinnitus, post-concussion syndrome, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), restless leg syndrome, and long COVID. The evidence for the efficacy of TMS for these neurological disorders, however, is still limited.

Single-pulse TMS is approved by the FDA for the acute treatment of migraines with aura. The patient uses a portable device during the aura phase to self-administer a single pulse of TMS to the back of the head. This can abort the attack. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) has been studied for the prevention of migraines and other types of pain. It appears effective, but compared to depression trials, migraine studies were relatively small and the FDA has not cleared rTMS for the treatment of migraines. This means that insurance companies are not likely to pay for this “off-label” use of TMS.

rTMS is generally considered safe and well-tolerated, with side effects typically mild and temporary, including scalp discomfort, headaches, and facial twitching. More serious side effects like seizures and mania are very rare. 

Before starting TMS, patients undergo a physical and mental health evaluation. The coil placement and dose are determined in the first session. During a TMS session, patients sit in a comfortable chair with earplugs. An electromagnetic coil is positioned near the scalp, delivering short magnetic pulses to specific brain regions involved in processing pain and other information. Patients feel and hear rapid tapping on their scalp that continues, on and off. Patients are awake and alert during the entire procedure. There are no limitations to activities before or after the treatment.

Treatment length varies from 20 to 45 minutes, depending on the stimulation pattern and number of sites stimulated. The frequency of treatments also varies – anywhere from daily for several weeks, to once a week. After the initial period of more frequent sessions, some patients require weekly or monthly sessions to maintain the effect. It may take a few weeks to see noticeable effects. 

TMS is a good choice for people who have not responded to multiple standard therapies, people who do not want to take drugs, those who also suffer from depression and anxiety, and pregnant women. Sufficient evidence suggests that TMS is as safe in children as it is in adults, with studies indicating its effectiveness in treating depression in adolescents.

Read More

The annual course, “The Shifting Migraine Paradigm 2024” will be held February 15-17, 2024 at the Plaza San Antonio Hotel & Spa. This three-day conference offers an excellent update on the treatment of migraine and other headaches.

It is always an honor to be invited to speak at this event. The topic of my presentation is Supplements and Medical Foods.

 

 

Read More

My recent blog post on supplement combinations mentioned one that contains magnesium, riboflavin, and feverfew. I did not mention its name to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. I am a paid consultant to the manufacturer. However, many readers of this blog want to know the name of this mystery product. It is called MigreLief.

Akeso, the manufacturer, also makes several related products. One is MigreLief NOW, which contains magnesium, feverfew, ginger, and boswellia. Both ginger and boswellia have proven anti-inflammatory properties.

Another product is a daily MigreLief supplement for children. It also contains magnesium, riboflavin and feverfew but at a lower dose and in smaller caplets.

Read More

A recently published study suggests that valproic acid (Depakene) given intravenously in an emergency room can relieve migraine headaches in children. The researchers also showed that giving these children an oral version of this drug, divalproex sodium (Depakote), does not reduce the frequency of future migraine attacks. 

Divalproex sodium was first approved by the FDA in 1983 for the treatment of epilepsy. Subsequently, it was also approved for the treatment of mania and for the prevention of migraine headaches. Notably, the FDA-approved label does not place any age limit on the use of this drug. It took years to discover all the risks associated with this medication. In rare instances, the drug may lead to liver failure and severe pancreatitis, both of which can be fatal. Moreover, divalproex sodium can result in significant congenital malformations, as well as diminished IQ scores and neurodevelopmental disorders when the fetus is exposed to the drug in utero. It is strictly contraindicated in pregnant women. Women of childbearing age must use effective contraception. Divalproex can also cause many other less dangerous but unpleasant side effects.

With all this in mind, why would anyone want to take this drug? It is certainly not on the list of my top 20 or 30 drugs for the prevention of migraines. I do, however, have several patients whose migraines did not respond to many drugs but are significantly improved with divalproex sodium. Such patients must have proper monitoring with regular blood tests.

We do occasionally give intravenous valproic acid in the office but only if 5 or 6 other acute treatments fail to stop a severe persistent migraine. It works in about half of our patients. I am even more reluctant to give this drug to children.

Read More

A new study published in JAMA Pediatrics found that engaging in screen time within the first 48 hours after concussion may prolong recovery time. The study was conducted by researchers at UCSF. They looked at data from 125 patients aged 12 to 25 who had recently been diagnosed with a concussion. The participants were divided into two groups: one group was allowed to use screens, and the other group was asked to abstain from screen time.

The study found that the group permitted to use screens had a significantly longer median recovery time of 8.0 days compared to 3.5 days in the group that abstained from screens. Additionally, individuals who used screens reported experiencing more symptoms such as headaches, dizziness, and fatigue. The screen time permitted group reported a median screen time of 630 minutes during the intervention period, while the screen time abstinent group reported 130 minutes.

The study’s authors concluded that avoiding screen time in the first 48 hours after concussion may help to shorten the duration of symptoms. However, this was a relatively small study and more research is needed to confirm these findings.

In a recent post, I mentioned a large Canadian study that showed that early return to school after a concussion was associated with better outcomes. These two reports are not contradictory. Most pediatric guidelines recommend 24 to 48 hours of physical and cognitive rest, followed by a gradual return to school with support and accommodations. Prolonged periods of complete physical and cognitive rest lasting one to two weeks can be detrimental.

Read More