Archive
New treatments

Galcanezumab (Emgality) was the third drug in the family of CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to become approved by the FDA for the prevention of migraines. It is more similar to fremanezumab (Ajovy) in its mechanism of action than to erenumab (Aimovig). Erenumab is an antibody that blocks the CGRP receptor, while galcanezumab and fremanezumab are antibodies that block the CGRP molecule. This may explain the fact that some patients who do not respond to one of these drugs may respond to another. Actually, even patients who do not respond or respond only partially to fremanezumab may respond to galcanezumab and the other way around. This should not be surprising since many drugs with the same mechanism of action may have different efficacy and side effects in different patients. In migraine treatment this applies to triptans, such as sumatriptan (Imitrex), rizatriptan (Maxalt), eletriptan (Relpax), and other, as well as beta blockers, such as propranolol (Inderal), atenolol (Tenormin), nebivolol (Bystolic).

Just like the other two CGRP mAbs, galcanezumab is injected monthly (although fremanezumab can be also given at a triple dose every three months). The initial dose is 240 mg, or two auto-injector pens, followed by a monthly dose of 120 mg. The main side effects are similar to the other two drugs, namely injection site reactions such as swelling, redness, and an allergic rash. Erenumab can be constipating, while the other two drugs are much less so.

The cost of all 3 drugs is the same – between $550 and $600 per monthly injection, but most insurers will pay for them if certain conditions are met. The main condition is that the patient first try and fail two oral preventive medications such as beta blockers listed above, an antidepressant such as amitriptyline (Elavil), nortriptyline (Pamelor), or duloxetine (Cymbalta), or an epilepsy drug such as topiramate (Topamax) or divalproex sodium (Depakote).

Another, more recent requirement from many insurers, is that the patient not be receiving Botox. This prohibition is very upsetting because it is not based on any science and because many patients find that together these treatments (Botox and a CGRP mAb) provide almost complete relief of their migraine attacks. Both Botox and CGRP mAbs can be life-changing on their own with dramatic relief in about 20% of patients, while another 50% of patients obtain only partial relief. This is a very rational combination because these treatments work in a totally different way and both are extremely safe with no drug interactions. The insurers justify their refusal by the fact that there are no published studies showing the safety of this combination, which is ludicrous. Some insurers, such as Cigna, go a step further in their obnoxiousness – even if a patient gets free mAb from the manufacturer or pays out of pocket, they refuse to pay for Botox. How do they know if the patient is getting a mAb? – to get prior approval for Botox we have to submit our medical notes.

All three manufacturers of mAbs, Amgen, Teva, and Eli Lilly provide up to one year of free medicine if your commercial insurance refuses to pay for it. Check each manufacturer’s website – Aimovig.com, Ajovy.com, and Emgality.com. Allergan, Botox manufacturer offers up to $700 off each quarterly treatment, so if you are paying out-of-pocket or have a high copay or deductible, check BotoxSavingsProgram.com 

Read More

To be eligible for this study you have to live in NYC or its suburbs and cannot be currently receiving Botox or a CGRP monoclonal antibody, such as Aimovig, Ajovy or Emgality.

PARTICIPATE IN MIGRAINE RESEARCH
A RANDOMIZED SHAM-CONTROLLED STUDY OF HOME-DELIVERED NON-INVASIVE NEUROSTIMULATION FOR MIGRAINE

• If you have frequent headaches (on 4 days or more/month) you may be eligible to enroll in a study of non-invasive neurostimulation aiming to reduce migraines.
• Neurostimulation provides stimulation of the nerves in the human body. Frequently used neurostimulation methods are for example, acupressure, acupuncture or TENS.
• This study uses a new neurostimulation method, tDCS. tDCS is a battery-powered device that delivers stimulation via two sponge pockets placed to a simple headband. Study participants will be assigned either to a group receiving active tDCS or to a control group receiving placebo tDCS.

If you are interested in more information about the study, please call the study personnel at 212-794-3550 or 212-440-1954 or email DrMauskop@nyheadache.com

Read More

I’ve given myself an injection of Ajovy in November and December with some improvement and without constipation which I had from Aimovig. However, Ajovy did not prevent all of my migraines, especially those caused by red wine, (I received some nice red wine over the holidays) and I still had to take sumatriptan (Imitrex).

This is not at all surprising; I always tell my patients that even the most effective treatment is not 100% effective – with enough triggers migraine will still occur. It is possible that with continued use of Ajovy my migraines would progressively get better, but my headaches are quickly and completely relieved by sumatriptan. Sumatriptan has a 25 year safety record and for over 10 years has been available without a prescription in most European countries (you may want to read my post on the daily use of triptans – it is by far the most popular with over 250 comments).

My next self-experiment is to try to prevent migraines with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). We are about to begin a double-blind sham-controlled study and I will describe it in in an upcoming post.

Read More

Fremanezumab (Ajovy) is the second CGRP monoclonal antibody to become after the introduction of erenumab (Aimovig) and it has some differentiating features. I injected myself with Aimovig twice and was able to drink more wine with relative impunity. The relief from my migraines was not complete, but very significant. However, I did experience constipation, which was quite unpleasant. Constipation is the only side effect of Aimovig reported with any frequency besides injection site reactions (an allergic rash can also occur). As one gets older (and I am 62), constipation becomes more prevalent. Although I could manage the constipation, it took an effort and I did not continue with Aimovig. My migraines are not at all disabling and I just cut back on wine. Besides wine, sleep deprivation and certain foods trigger my migraines, but they are easily managed with sumatriptan tablets or when I want fast onset of action, with sumatriptan injections.

After a couple of months, I decided to try Ajovy and took a shot on November 6. It worked at least as well as Aimovig and did not cause constipation. The effect lasted exactly a month and then migraines returned, so I took a second shot on December 13. Both Ajovy injections started to work within a day, although in some of my patients it takes a week.

I continue to prescribe Aimovig as well as Ajovy and sometimes, the third drug in this family, galcanezumab (Emgality). If someone is prone to constipation, my first choice is definitely Ajovy. Another small difference is the mode of delivery. You can give yourself a shot of Aimovig (and Emgality) with a push of a button, while Ajovy comes in a pre-filled syringe. Some patients find autoinjectors painful and opt for the prefilled syringe of Ajovy . Others, do not want to see the needle and prefer Aimovig’s pen-like device. One additional advantage of Ajovy is that it can be given every 3 months, although it requires 3 shots each time. Some of our patients who do not like giving themselves any kind of an injection opt for coming for a visit every 3 months and having our doctors or nurse practitioners administer Ajovy.

We have treated hundreds of patients with Aimovig and Ajovy and a few dozen with Emgality. Some who did not respond to Aimovig (we usually give two sets of monthly injections before giving up), responded well to Ajovy. This is probably due to the fact that they have a slightly different mechanism of action. Both are monoclonal antibodies that block the effect of CGRP, a neurotransmitter which is released during a migraine attack, but Aimovig blocks the CGRP receptor, while Ajovy (and Emgality) block the CGRP molecule. This difference may also explain why Aimovig constipates and the other two drugs do not.

About one fifth of patients have a dramatic relief from these medications, while about 50% have a 50% drop in the number of headaches. Some patients in the latter group may require continued treatment with Botox or oral medications, but together these treatments also result in a marked reduction in migraine-related disability. We also continue to prescribe abortive drugs such as sumatriptan (Imitrex) to all patients because even in complete responders an occasional migraine can still occur.

Read More

The FDA has just approved galcanezumab (Emgality), the third CGRP monoclonal antibody for the prophylactic treatment of migraines. It follows erenumab (Aimovig) and fremanezumab (Ajovy) and just like these two drugs it appears to be very safe and very effective for over 50% of patients.

Galcanezumab is also administered by a monthly subcutaneous injection. The initial dose is two 120 mg injections, followed by a single 120 mg injection every month. Similarly to erenumab, it comes in an autoinjector pen which is easy to self-administer. Fremanezumab is not available in an autoinjector pen but only in a small prefilled syringe, which may make some patients hesitant to use it, however injecting with a prefilled syringe is often less painful.

Galcanezumab and fremanezumab list as their only side effect injection site reaction, while erenumab also has the side effect of constipation. Erenumab was approved four months ago and at our Center we have already injected about 300 patients. Constipation is a problem for a small number of patients and in a couple of them it was severe enough that they stopped the injections.

Fremanezumab was approved only a couple of weeks ago and we’ve treated only about a dozen patients so far, so it is too early to tell if it will also cause constipation. After all, these three drugs are similar to each other in that they block the effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a chemical released during a migraine attack. The only difference in the way they work is that erenumab blocks the CGRP receptor, where the CGRP molecule attaches itself, while the other two drugs block the actual CGRP molecule. It is possible that this difference in the mechanism of action is why erenumab is more likely to cause constipation.

We have also seen one patient who developed a rash about 5-6 days after being injected with erenumab, which resolved with a short course of prednisone.

All three manufacturers offer a free trial, in come cases for up to a year. Many insurers are starting to pay for these truly remarkable medications, although most require that the patient first tries and fails one or two inexpensive oral preventive medications. We’ve also encountered some insurers who will pay for either Botox or erenumab, but not for both. This is a problem for some of our patients who get partial relief from each treatment and almost complete relief when these two are combined. One strategy is to continue obtaining Botox through the insurance and getting one of the monoclonal antibodies through the free trial program.

One common question we get asked is how soon will the injection work. In some patients the relief begins in a couple of days, but we have also seen patients who improve only after 2 treatments. The large trials that led to the FDA approval suggest that each subsequent treatment will provide better relief than the previous one.

Read More

As expected, we’ve been overwhelmed by the demand for the new preventive therapy for migrianes, erenumab (Aimovig). It offers a unique and highly effective therapy with virtually no known side effects, at least so far.

My patients are usually glad to hear that I have migraines (without an aura, but I also have auras without a headache) because I can better relate to their experience. They often ask if I had tried this or another treatment and indeed, I’ve tried many, sometimes less out of necessity but more for the experience. I have never tried drugs such as topiramate (Topamax) or divalproex (Depakote) because they have many potentially serious side effects and I prescribe them very reluctantly after trying many other treatments. I have injected myself with Botox on two occasions, have given myself a nerve block and an intravenous infusion of magnesium.

Luckily, even when I have periods of very frequent attacks, my migraines are easily controlled with sumatriptan tablets or injections. I prefer injections when I want quick relief, such as before going to bed, in the middle of the night, or during a busy work day.

Although over 3,000 patients have been exposed to erenumab in clinical trials and some of them have been on it for 5 years, the true safety of the drug may not be known for at least another 3-5 years.

Even though my migraines do not cause any disability or interfere with my life (except for the need to avoid wine), in the tradition of doctors experimenting on themselves, yesterday I gave myself a shot of erenumab. It was painless and caused no local reaction, which is the most common side effect seen in 5%-6% of patients. This lack of serious and not so serious side effects has been the most surprising aspect of not only erenumab, but also of the other 3 CGRP monoclonal antibodies in development. So admittedly, injecting myself with erenumab was not an act of bravery and I really did it to see if I can drink more wine and take less sumatriptan.

Read More

The first of the four CGRP monoclonal antibodies developed for the prevention of migraines is expected to be approved by the FDA in the next 2-3 months. The other three should be approved within a year. All four will be given by an injection (three subcutaneously and one, intravenously).

Most people prefer tablets to injections and two companies are developing three drugs with the same mechanism of action as the monoclonal antibodies (blocking CGRP), but in a tablet form. The original CGRP drug in a tablet form was developed by Merck and it was very effective for the prevention and acute treatment of migraines, but a few patients developed liver side effects. The side effects were not serious, just abnormal blood tests, which returned to normal once the drug was stopped, but nevertheless Merck stopped the development of telcagepant in 2009. This led pharma companies to shift to the development of monoclonal antibodies, which bypass the liver, but can be given only by injection.

Allergan and Biohaven are two companies that are developing oral CGRP drugs in the hope that they can achieve good efficacy without the side effects. Allergan just released the results of the first phase 3 study of ubrogepant. The study included 1327 U.S. adult patients who were given placebo, ubrogepant 50 mg or 100 mg. They treated a single migraine attack of moderate to severe headache intensity. Both doses were significantly better than placebo in achieving pain freedom at 2 hours after the initial dose. Sensitivity to light, noise, and nausea also significantly improved with the drug, but not placebo. The side effect profile of ubrogepant was similar to placebo without serious liver problems.

Results of the second phase 3 trial are expected in the first half of 2018. Allergan plans to file these results with the FDA in 2019, after which the FDA has a year to review the data and will hopefully approve the drug.

Read More

Two landmark studies on an entirely new type of treatment for migraines have been just published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

One of the reports describes a phase 3 trial (final phase that can lead to the FDA approval), which was conducted by Teva Pharmaceuticals using a monoclonal antibody, fremanezumab to treat patients with chronic migraine (patients with 15 or more headache days each month). The study involved 1,130 patients who were divided into three groups: one group received monthly injections (subcutaneously, i.e. under the skin) of the active medicine, another group was given an injection of the real medicine every 3 months and placebo injections monthly in between, and the third group received placebo injections every month. Patients in both groups that received real shots did much better than those given placebo. They had fewer days with headaches, used less of the abortive migraine medications, and had a lower impact of migraines on their lives. The effect of the drug lasted 3 months, which suggests that one injection every three months will be sufficient. We also hope that patients will be able to inject themselves and not have to come to doctors’ offices every month. The side effects were mostly related to the injection itself – pain, swelling, and bruising.

The second study conducted by Amgen and Novartis utilized a similar drug, erenumab (it will have the brand name of Aimovig when it becomes available in the middle of next year) to prevent episodic migraines, that is migraines that occur on fewer than 15 headache days each month. A total of 955 patients participated in this study and they were also divided into three groups: those receiving either 70 or 140 mg of medicine and a group receiving placebo. Injections were given monthly to prevent migraine attacks. Both doses of the drug resulted in significantly fewer migraine attacks and improvement in physical impairment and everyday activities. Side effects were mostly due to the injection site reactions, just like with fremanezumab.

Both fremanezumab and erenumab belong to the family of CGRP monoclonal antibodies, drugs that block a neurotransmitter CGRP which is released during a migraine attack. Two additional companies, Eli Lilly and Alder are developing similar drugs, galcanezumab and eptinezumab, which are also expected to be approved next year. Eli Lilly’s drug is also being tested for the prevention of episodic cluster headaches.

I first wrote about the CGRP drugs in a blog post in 2007, more than 10 years ago. At that point CGRP was the target of research for over 10 years, so in total, it will have taken 20 years to bring these new drugs to the market. It was even longer with triptans, such as sumatriptan (Imitrex) – it took 30 years since the discovery of the potential role of serotonin to the approval of sumatriptan. The drug development process takes not only decades of time, but also billions of dollars, which explains why new drugs are so expensive, at least in the first few years. After years of being on the market, prices of drugs tend to go down and now 90 tablets of sumatriptan can be bought for $70 at Costco, while similar branded triptan drugs used to cost $40 for a single tablet.

Read More

Ketamine is a medicine that is sometimes given intravenously for anesthesia. It is a controlled drug because it can induce euphoria and is potentially addictive. In a previous post I mentioned several anecdotal reports about the beneifical effect of ketamine for a prolonged migraine aura, hemiplegic migraine and other types of headaches.

A presentation at the recent annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists described the results of ketamine infusion on severe migraines in patients admitted to the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia from 2014 to 2016. 48 of the 61 patients (77%) responded to this treatment, meaning that their pain levels improved by at least 2 points on a 1 to 10 scale. On average, the infusion had to be given for 5 days. Side effects included sedation (51%), blurry vision (38%), nausea or vomiting (38%), hallucinations (28%), vivid dreams (13%), and low blood pressure (5%). The authors described the adverse effects as mild in nature and only 1 patient discontinued treatment. However, having hallucinations, drop in blood pressure or vomiting does no sound like mild side effects to me. On the other hand, these were patients whose migraine did not respond to other treatments and they needed to be hospitalized, so these side effects could in fact be acceptable if the treatment ultimately provides relief.

Review of patient records admitted to the same hospital between 2006 and 2014 showed the mean headache pain rating using a 0-10 pain scale dropped from 7 on admission to 4 on discharge. The majority (55 out of 77, or 71%) of patients responded by the same definition of an at least 2-point improvement in headache pain at discharge. Only a quarter of responders maintained this benefit at their follow-up office visit. The mean length of infusion was also 5 days. And again, most patients tolerated ketamine well with “very few serious side effects”.

Anecdotal evidence also exists for the use of ketamine infusions to treat depression. There are some outpatient clinics that offer ketamine infusions for chronic pain and depression and a few of my patients have gone there, but unfortunately with little success.

Read More

Medical marijuana has been legalized in NY and more than 20 other states. It is approved in NY for several medical conditions, including pain and some of my patients with headaches (about one out of 3), arthritis, and other pains have found it to be very helpful. Some patients use it acutely (as a vaporizer or tincture) and report relief of pain, and/or nausea and for some it allows them to go to sleep and sleep off their migraines. Tablets of medical marijuana can prevent migraines if taken once or twice a day. Most people need products with a low THC/CBD ratio which does not cause euphoria or other cognitive effect.

Despite the requirement by states to have verified amounts of active ingredients, THC and CBD in the medical marijuana products, the efficacy and the side effects vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. This could be in part due to ingredients other than THC and CBD. Fortunately, many researchers are looking into the effect of pure ingredients and their mechanism of action.

Such a study was presented at the recent meeting of the American Headache Society by scientists from the Missouri State University led by Paul Durham. They developed a new animal model of migraine in rats and triggered a process in the rats’ brains that is similar to a migraine in humans. Administering cannabidiol (CBD) suppressed increased sensitivity in the trigeminal nerve and produced other positive effects, suggesting a possible mechanism by which CBD may relieve migraine and other facial pains. The next logical step would be to add small amounts of THC to see if it enhances the effect of CBD (so called entourage effect).

Read More

Temporal arteritis occurs in one out of 5,000 people over 50. Women are 3-4 times more likely to be affected. It is not common below the age of 60 and becomes more prevalent with the advancing age. Temporal arteritis is also known as giant cell arteritis because it causes inflammation of arteries with giant cells seen under the microscope.

Headache is often the first symptom and it is typically localized to one temple, but it can involve other parts of the head and occur on both sides. If left undiagnosed and untreated temporal arteritis can cause a stroke and blindness, which can affect both eyes.

Besides headaches, temporal arteritis can cause neck and jaw pain, weakness, muscle aches, and a mild fever. The preliminary diagnosis is made by blood tests (ESR and CRP) and it is confirmed by a biopsy of the temporal artery. Polymyalgia rheumatica is a related rheumatological condition, which can occur alone or with temporal arteritis and it causes severe muscle pains.

Temporal arteritis (and polymyalgia rheumatica) are treated with steroid medications, such as prednisone. Although the initial dose is high, relatively small doses are usually effective for maintenance. Since the condition can last for years and long-term intake of prednisone can cause many potentially serious side effects it is very important to perform a temporal artery biopsy in most cases, rather than rely just on blood tests and clinical diagnosis.

Subcutaneous injection of Actemra (tocilizumab) was just approved by the FDA for the treatment of temporal arteritis. This drug has been available since 2010 for the treatment of rheumatoid and other forms of arthritis. Actemra was injected every two weeks for a year along with prednisone, but more patients were able to get off prednisone if they received Actemra rather than a placebo injection. Unfortunately Actemra also has potentially dangerous side effects, such as serious infections and it requires regular blood tests.

Because headache is one of the main symptoms of giant cell arteritis, the condition is often diagnosed by a neurologist or a primary care doctor. The treatment though is typically handled by a rheumatologist and they are already familiar with tocilizumab.

Read More

Medical marijuana was legalized in New York in February of this year. Since then, I’ve prescribed it to over 30 patients and about a third of them have found it to be effective. We are planning an observational study to determine which of the three approved types (inhaled, sublingual, oral) and what ratio of active ingredients (THC/CBD) are preferred by migraine sufferers. Doctors who prescribe medical marijuana do have to take an online training course, but the course does not teach about the optimal use because no one has researched this question. There are also regulatory issues to deal with.

Several sets of guidelines have been published by various medical organizations addressing the proper use of medical marijuana, other than dosing and route of administration. Here are some of the recommendations with my comments:

“The doctor should adhere to current standards of practice and comply with state laws, rules and regulations, which may specify conditions for which a patient may quality.”
Migraine is not one of the conditions listed specifically, but it is often accompanied by neuropathic pain, which is listed.

“The doctor’s office should not be located at a marijuana dispensary or cultivation center. The doctor should not receive financial compensation from or hold a financial interest in marijuana-related businesses or be affiliated with them in any way.”
This one is easy for us.

“The physician should not use marijuana either medicinally or recreationally while actively engaged in the practice of medicine.”
I’ve never tried it.

“There should be an established doctor-patient relationship before the doctor considers the use of medical marijuana.”
I prescribe it only to our established patients.

“The doctor should do a physical exam and gather health history, including documentation of previous therapies used by the patient and information on any personal or family history of substance abuse, mental illness or psychotic disorders. The diagnosis should justify the consideration of medical marijuana.”
All of our patients undergo a thorough evaluation.

“The doctor should review other treatment options. The known benefits and risks of marijuana should be presented, along with the warning that, unlike with FDA-approved drugs, there is variability and lack of standardization in marijuana preparation.”
We use medical marijuana only after other non-drug and drug treatments fail.

“If the medical marijuana is chosen, a specific treatment plan for a limited period of time should be agreed on, with details documented in the medical record. The doctor should instruct the patient not to drive or operate heavy machinery while using marijuana.”
Yes, I do that.

“The patient should be seen for follow-up visits to monitor for efficacy and side effects of medical marijuana.”
This is a standard practice with any treatment.

“Patients with a history of mental health problems, substance abuse or addiction should be referred for further evaluation as needed.”
I typically avoid prescribing medical marijuana to such patients.

Read More