Archive
New treatments

Nausea is a very common symptom that accompanies migraine attacks. Effective treatment of migraine with a drug like sumatriptan often stops the headache, nausea, and other associated symptoms. However, sometimes pain subsides, while nausea does not, or nausea is much more bothersome than the headache. Nausea can also be a side effect of the most effective injectable migraine drug, dihydroergotamine (DHE-45). We often administer this drug in our office after other injectable drugs (magnesium, sumatriptan, ketorolac, dexamethasone, etc) fail. If nausea is already present, we will always give an intravenous injection of a nausea drug such as ondansetron (Zofran) or metoclopramide (Reglan) before giving DHE. Sometimes these drugs are ineffective in preventing nausea and vomiting induced by DHE and we have to look for other options.

Phenothiazine family of drugs, including prochlorperazine (Compazine), chlorpromazine (Thorazine), and promethazine (Phenergan) are very old and effective anti-nausea drugs. However, they have a potential for a rare but devastating side effect, which consists of persistent involuntary movements of the face (grimacing and lip smacking) and body. The onset of this side effect can be delayed, which is why it is called tardive dyskinesia. It is not unusual for these drugs to cause an immediate severe and very unpleasant restlessness (akathisia), which patients sometimes describe as wanting to crawl out of one’s skin. Metoclopramide (Reglan) can also cause these side effects, but less often.

Ondansetron (Zofran) does not cause any such side effects and should be the preferred drug for nausea of migraine, although it is only approved for nausea caused by chemotherapy or radiation and for post-surgical nausea. Since it has become generic and inexpensive, it can be used for other causes of nausea, including migraines. It is available as an injection or as a tablet.

Aprepitant (Emend) is an anti-nausea drug that has a totally different mechanism of action than the medications described above, so it is possible that it can help when other drugs do not or when other drugs cause side effects.

A study just published in Neurology by Dr. Denise Chou and her colleagues describes the use of oral aprepitant in the treatment of DHE-induced nausea in hospitalized patients.

The authors reviewed hourly diary data and clinical notes of patients admitted to the hospital for the treatment of refractory migraine headaches (status migrainosus) with DHE infusions between 2011 and 2015.

They identified 74 such patients, of whom 24 had daily diaries. In 36 of 57 cases in which aprepitant was given, there was a 50% reduction in the number of other anti-nausea medications given to patients. Of 57 patients, 52 reported that the addition of aprepitant improved nausea. Among 21 of 24 patients with hourly diary data, nausea scores were reduced. In all 12 patients with vomiting aprepitant stopped it. Aprepitant was well tolerated and caused no side effects.

The authors concluded that aprepitant can be effective in the treatment of refractory DHE-induced nausea and vomiting. They also suggested that perhaps this drug could be used for nausea of migraine even when DHE is not given. The only problem, and it is a very big problem, is the cost. This drug is not going to be available in a generic form until 2018. A single capsule of Emend costs $105 with a coupon you can get on GoodRx.com. Without a coupon, it is $145. A single vial for injection costs $345, so we are not going to use this drug for nausea due to migraine or DHE for at least two years, when cheaper generic copies become available.

Read More

Fibromyalgia is a condition comorbid with migraine, which means that migraine sufferers are more likely to have fibromyalgia and those with fibromyalgia are more likely to have migraines (such relationships are not always bidirectional). One common finding in these two conditions is low magnesium level and both condition often improve with magnesium supplementation or magnesium infusions.

A new study by Dr. T. Romano of 60 patients with fibromyalgia showed that those who have low red blood cell (RBC) magnesium levels are likely to have low levels of growth hormone (IGF-1, or insulin-like growth factor 1). RBC magnesium level is a more accurate test than the routine serum magnesium level, which is highly unreliable as most of the body’s magnesium sits inside the cells.

Dr. Romano recommends magnesium supplementation and a referral to an endocrinologist. It is possible that treatment with growth hormone will help those who are deficient, although it is also possible that magnesium supplementation alone (oral or intravenous, if oral is ineffective) could increase the production of growth hormone.

Read More

A patient of mine just emailed me about a recent segment of the TV show, The Doctors, which featured a woman whose severe chronic migraines were cured by nasal surgery. The segment was shot a few weeks after the surgery, so it is not clear how long the relief will last in her case. The surgery involved removing a contact point, which occurs in people with a deviated septum. The septum, which consists of a cartilage in the front and bone in the back, divides the left and the right sides of the nose. If the bony septum is very deviated, which often happens from an injury, it sometimes touches the side of the nose, creating a contact point between the septum and the bony side wall of the nose.
contact point headache
Several small reports by ENT surgeons have described dramatic relief of migraine headaches with the removal of the contact point. If headaches are constant, then the constant pressure of the contact point would explain the pain. However, many of the successfully treated migraine sufferers had intermittent attacks. The theory of how a contact point could cause intermittent migraines is that if something causes swelling of the mucosa (lining) of the nasal cavity, then this swelling increases the pressure at the contact point and triggers a headache. This swelling can be caused by nasal congestion due to allergies, red wine, exercise, and possibly other typical migraine triggers.

This is a good theory, but it is only a theory and the dramatic relief seen after surgery could be all due to the placebo effect. The only way to prove that contact point headaches exist and can be relieved by surgery is by conducting a double-blind study, where half of the patients undergoes surgery and the other half does not. Giving both groups sedation and bringing them to the operating room will blind the patient while the neurologist who evaluates them will also not know who was operated on and who was not, making this a double-blind study. This design is also good only in theory because those who had surgery will have bloody nasal discharge and nasal packing, thus breaking the blind.

However, despite the fact that we will not see any double-blind studies in the near future, there is one way to predict who may respond to contact point surgery. An ENT surgeon can spray a local anesthetic, such as lidocaine, around the contact point during a migraine attack and if pain goes away, then surgery is more likely to help. I would not recommend anyone having surgery without such a test.

Read More

A hole between the left and the right side of the heart has been suspected to be the cause of migraines in some people. However, closing this hole has not produced dramatic improvement in several blinded studies that have been conducted in the past few years.

The hole, called atrial septal defect (ASD) is present in utero but begins to close as soon as the baby is born. In about 1.5% of the population (in twice as many women than men) the hole does not close completely. In most people this hole is small and does not cause any symptoms. However, if it is big, it requires intervention because it can lead to heart failure and strokes. Smaller ASD may not cause any symptoms, but has been suspected to be related to migraine headaches, especially migraines preceded by a visual aura.

The closure of ASD is done by threading up through a vein in the groin an umbrella-like device which is positioned and opened inside the heart to close the hole. A recent study looked at the need for different blood thinners to prevent blood clots from forming in the heart after the procedure. Half of the 171 migraine patients in the study were given aspirin and placebo and the other half aspirin and clopidogrel, another blood thinner. Interestingly, those who were given two blood thinners (aspirin and clopidogrel) had less severe migraine attacks than those on one (aspirin and placebo). This suggests, that the benefit seen in some of the previous ASD closure studies was due to the blood thinner rather than the procedure itself.

A trial currently under way at the Columbia University Medical Center is examining whether a different blood thinner, Brilinta will improve migraines in those with an ASD. If you’d like to consider participating and want to learn more about the study, go to this website.

Read More

Inpatient migraine headache treatment in the US is usually limited to a five-day course of intravenous DHE and other medications. Even such brief admissions are not always approved by the insurance companies. Many patients improve after these admissions, but often only for a short time because besides some reduction in pain intensity, very little else changes in the patient’s life and her brain. It makes sense that longer-term inpatient rehabilitation of chronic migraine and pain patients can lead to a major and lasting improvement, but it is almost unheard of in the US. However, it is available in Germany and other countries.

Last November I lectured at one of the leading German inpatient rehabilitation facilities, the Berolina Klinik. My blog post about the Klinik was read by an Englishman with severe chronic migraines who was recently treated there with a three-week program with excellent results. Here is one of the articles that appeared in German press – Westfalen-Blatt 27.10.15.

And, shockingly to us Americans, the cost of treatment is less than $7,000 for a three-week stay in this top facility. Even with travel costs, it’s a bargain. I have been mentioning Berolina Klinik to my patients, although haven’t had anyone make the trip yet.

Read More

Zecuity, a skin patch containing a migraine drug sumatriptan was approved by the FDA almost two years ago, but it became available (by prescription) only last month (see my previous post about Zecuity). The product is not available in retail pharmacies, only from a specialty pharmacy. The doctor who prescribes the patch will usually provide information on where to get it. Otherwise, go to zecuity.com, where you can find a section entitled Migraine Support Solutions. At this site you can verify that your insurance covers this product, get it shipped to you, and then get information on how to apply the patch. A discount coupon is also available on the site and it promises that the copay will be as low as $15. That is a good thing, because it looks like (on GoodRx.com) each patch costs $300. Yes, not $30, but $300 a piece, or $1,200 for a box of 4. I don’t think too many people will be buying this patch if their insurance does not cover it.

So, who is the best candidate for Zecuity? Half of migraine sufferers experience nausea and/or vomiting with their attacks. This makes the absorption of oral drugs, such as triptans (Imitrex, Maxalt, Zomig, etc) so slow as to make them ineffective. In such patients we try to bypass the stomach, which until now was possible to do with a nasal spray, suppository, or an injection. Sumatriptan (Imitrex) is available in the US in tablets, nasal spray and self-administered injections. Nasal spray of sumatriptan is not very effective, but injections work better than tablets. Relief from an injection can occur in as quickly as 10 minutes, but injections can cause more side effects, which are mostly unpleasant rather than dangerous. Obviously, most people would rather not get a shot. One form of injectable sumatriptan delivers the medicine through the skin without a needle (Sumavel), but not without pain see this post.

One other triptan, zolmitriptan (Zomig) is available in a nasal spray and it is more effective than sumatriptan nasal spray, but it is not available in a generic form, making it less accessible because of the high cost and restricted insurance coverage.

The perfect patient for Zecuity is someone who experiences nausea and/or vomiting with their migraine attacks and who does not respond to tablets and has side effects from or aversion to injections. Zecuity provides good relief for such patients with the main side effect being skin irritation from the patch. The patch is fairly large, the size of a palm. It uses a miniature battery to generate an electric current, which helps drive the medicine through the skin. Iontopheresis is the name of this process. Iontopheresis has been known for decades, but Zecuity is the first product approved by the FDA to utilize this technology.

Disclosure – Teva Pharmaceuticals, manufacturer of Zecuity pays me to give lectures about Zecuity to doctors.

Read More

Fluctuations in the female hormone estrogen have been proven to be involved in triggering menstrual and perimenopausal migraine headaches. Testosterone levels have been reported to be low in men and women with cluster headaches. Testosterone replacement therapy seems to help these patients, when other standard treatments for cluster headaches do not.

A study presented at the recent annual meeting of the American Headache Society reported on testosterone levels in men with chronic migraine headaches. A significant percentage of men with chronic migraines also have low testosterone levels. This study did not look at the effect of testosterone replacement therapy, but it is possible that it may help chronic migraine sufferers as it does those with cluster headaches. It seems prudent to check testosterone level in men with chronic migraine headaches who do not respond to standard approaches such as medications, Botox injections, magnesium, and other treatments. And if the level is low, replacement therapy should be tried.

Read More

For years researchers have tried to find ways to block various chemicals (neurotransmitters) released during a migraine attack, including serotonin, CGRP, nitric oxide, substance P, glutamate, and other. Triptans (such as IMitrex or sumatriptan), the first “designer” drugs for migraine, which were developed over 20 years ago, bind to a very specific subtype of serotonin receptor and are very effective in stopping a migraine attack.

A very promising new type of migraine medications is being developed by at least four different companies – Alder, Amgen, Eli Lily, and Teva. These drugs are monoclonal antibodies against the CGRP molecule or the CGRP receptor. CGRP (calcitonin gene-related peptide) is widely distributed in the body and is involved in regulating blood vessel opening and in the function of the nervous system. All four companies developing these drugs recently presented the results of their phase II clinical trials and the data looks very promising. The antibody tightly binds to its target (CGRP molecule or receptor) with the effect lasting a month, or in case of the Alder drug, up to 6 months. The Alder drug is given every six months intravenously, while the other three, are given every month by an injection into the muscle.

All four drugs appear to be very effective in preventing migraine attacks when compared to a placebo injection. And fortunately, at least so far, they all look very safe. However, in phase II trials only a couple of hundred patients are treated and we need to await the results of the larger and more definitive phase III trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of this new group of medications. This means that the earliest we will see these drugs approved by the FDA is in about 3 years.

It is possible that these drugs will be effective not only for the prevention of migraines, but also for stopping an acute migraine attack.

Read More

An opening between the left and the right side of the heart, called patent foramen ovale (PFO), is found in 25% of the general population. It has been found to be more common in people who suffer from migraines. A large PFOs can cause shortness of breath, heart failure, and strokes and they are usually closed surgically. Several companies developed a device to close this opening without open heart surgery, but rather by inserting an umbrella-like device through a vein in the groin.

The manufacturers of these devices have conducted clinical trials in the hope of preventing migraines by closing the PFO. The results so far have been mixed with some studies showing improvement in migraines and some showing no benefit. A study just presented at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society by Dr. Andrew Charles of UCLA and his colleagues reported on one such trial. This study was blinded, with 107 patients having a sham procedure (the catheter was inserted into the groin vein, but the PFO was not closed) and 123 having their PFO closed. Overall, there was a significant reduction in headache days in the closure group (-3.4 days) compared with the sham group (-2.0 days), however there was no difference in the primary efficacy endpoint of the number of patients with 50% or more reduction in migraine attacks.

A subset of patients did particularly well compared to the sham group – patients who had migraine aura with the majority of their migraine attacks. A significant reduction in migraine days was present in half of patients with aura compared with a quarter in the control group. About 11% (8 out of 74 patients) of those who had migraine with aura had complete elimination of migraine attacks, while this happened to only 1.5% (1 out of 68 patients) in the sham group with auras.

This study suggests that patients who have auras with the majority of their migraine attacks and whose migraines are difficult to control should undergo an echocardiogram to test for the possible presence of a PFO. If PFO is present, it may be reasonable to consider seeing an interventional cardiologist to close the PFO. This is a relatively safe procedure if done by an experienced doctor and that is a very important if. Pick a doctor who has done a hundred or more of these procedures.

Read More

A topical cream seems to be effective in treating migraine headaches. Achelios Therapeutics announced results from a Phase IIa placebo-controlled clinical trial in moderate and severe migraine sufferers treated with Topofen, the company’s proprietary topical anti-migraine therapy. This is a well-known non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ketoprofen, which is applied to the face and seems to provide relief for patients suffering from acute migraine.

The results of the clinical trial were presented at the American Academy of Neurology annual meeting in Washington, D.C. Surprisingly, this study showed that it may be possible to relieve severe migraine with a topical application to facial nerve endings. Topical application avoids potentially serious side effects of NSAIDs, such as stomach bleeding and ulcers. The randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involved only 48 adults with a history of episodic migraine with and without aura. Of the severe migraine patients, 77 percent experienced relief of pain and migraine-associated symptoms and 45 percent had sustained pain relief from two to 24 hours compared to 15 percent on placebo. Also, 50 percent of patients who treated their severe pain with Topofen were pain free at 24 hours compared to 25 percent of placebo-treated patients. Some patients experienced application-site irritation, which was mild or moderate in severity. That was the only reported side effect, which resolved quickly.

Such a small study does not prove that this treatment is in fact effective. A typical drug trial required for an FDA approval usually involves hundreds of patients. However, you do not need to wait for this cream to appear on the market because there are creams containing an NSAID already available by prescription (Voltaren Gel) and over-the-counter (Aspercreme). It is possible that the cream tested in the study may be better because it is a different NSAID, but Voltaren Gel is already approved and you can ask your doctor for a prescription. It is possible that insurance companies will not pay for it since it is not approved for migraines. A tube of Voltaren Gel will cost you about $55 (go to GoodRx.com to get the lowest price).

Read More

Cost is the only major issue with Botox injections, which is the only FDA-approved treatment for chronic migraines and which is now covered by almost all insurance companies. It is very safe and highly effective, relieving headaches in 70% of migraine sufferers. A study just published in the journal Headache suggests that Botox may be not only clinically effective, but also cost-effective.

Researchers from the Renown Neurosciences Institute in Reno, Nevada analyzed data from 230 chronic migraine sufferers who did not respond to two or more prophylactic drugs and were given Botox injections. Botox was given twice, three months apart. Compared with the 6 months before Botox, there were 55% fewer emergency room visits, 59% fewer urgent care visits, and 57% fewer admissions to the hospital. In those 6 months the savings amounted to half of the cost of Botox treatments. Considering that improvement tends to get more pronounced with each subsequent Botox treatment, it is very likely that the costs savings would grow with additional treatments.

Obviously, besides saving money, Botox provides a significant improvement in the quality of people’s lives, which is much harder to measure. At our Center we give Botox to more than a quarter of our patients and see a dramatic improvement in the majority. Botox is not only much more effective for chronic migraines, but it is also much safer than any oral medication.

Read More

A new report by Drs. Gfrerer, Maman and their colleagues at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston entitled Non-Endoscopic Deactivation of Nerve Triggers in Migraine Headache Patients: Surgical Technique and Outcomes was recently published in the journal Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. Surgery for refractory migraine headaches was developed by Dr. Bahman Guyuron and others and was reported to benefit between 68 and 95% patients. This surgery involves cutting or freeing up nerves in the scalp that appear to be responsible for triggering migraines. Some surgeons use a laparascopic technique, which involves making only a few small incisions while others do this surgery through conventional incisions. The authors of this new study argue that endoscopic techniques may not be appropriate in many cases since some surgeons have little experience or limited access to the endoscope and in some patients this technique is not practical because the nerves could run in an unusual pattern, which would make them hard to find through a small incision.

This study involved 43 consecutive procedures in 35 patients. All patients completed questionnaires before and 12 months after surgery. The overall positive response rate was 91%. Total elimination of migraine headaches was reported in 51%, greater than 80% resolution of symptoms in 21%, and 28% had resolution between 50-80%. No improvement was reported after 9% of procedures. There were no major adverse events.

The authors concluded that non-endoscopic surgery was safe and effective treatment in select migraine headache patients.

Most headache experts agree that until proven effective in large controlled studies, surgery should be done only as a part of such a large controlled trial. Just like with previous studies of surgery for migraines, this was a small and not a rigorously controlled trial. Placebo response to surgical procedures is usually very high, however it is rarely 90% and the effect rarely lasts 12 months, as it did in this study. Considering these facts, as well as that this study was done at a reputable institution and that this group consisted of refractory patients (those who did not respond to conventional therapy, including Botox), surgery may in fact offer some real benefits to a small group of patients. We need larger and better controlled trials to figure out if that is indeed the case and what type of patients are the best candidates for surgery.

Read More