Psychology of headaches | Headache NewsBlog

Disruption of brain networks by chronic pain can be prevented.

By: Dr. Mauskop

18-08-2024

Alternative Therapies, Brain disorders, Pain, Pain Research, Psychology of headaches

Chronic pain is known to alter the brain’s default mode network (DMN). The DMN is a group of interconnected brain regions activated when a person is not focused on the external world. Key DMN functions include mind wandering (daydreaming, thinking about the past or future, imagining scenarios), self-reflection (considering thoughts, feelings, and experiences), theory of mind (understanding others’ thoughts and intentions), and memory (retrieval and processing).

A recent study published in the journal Pain by German researchers investigated the relationship between chronic back pain and DMN alterations. The study, titled “Beyond the chronic pain stage: default mode network perturbation depends on years lived with back pain,” examined patients with chronic back pain (CBP), subacute back pain (SBP), and healthy controls using fMRI.

Results showed that the DMN is significantly altered in CBP patients compared to healthy individuals. Importantly, the degree of DMN disruption increased with the duration of pain, suggesting that the brain adapts to persistent pain over time. This adaptation is influenced by cognitive coping strategies or how individuals mentally manage their pain.

The study found that coping attitudes mediate the link between DMN changes and pain duration. This implies that how people think about and handle pain impacts their brain’s adaptation to it. Effective pain coping strategies could potentially lessen the negative effects of chronic pain on the brain, emphasizing the importance of psychological interventions like meditation, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and acceptance-commitment therapy (ACT).

These findings also provide a scientific basis for treatments like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and other brain stimulation methods, which aim to restore normal brain connectivity, including DMN function.

If two antidepressants fail, TMS may offer relief.

By: Dr. Mauskop

11-08-2024

Alternative Therapies, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Headache medications, neurostimulation, Psychology of headaches

The FDA approved transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to treat anxiety, depression, and OCD about 15 years ago. Most insurers cover this treatment. However, it remains highly underutilized.

A study just published by Dutch researchers in Psychiatry Online compared TMS with a third antidepressant in people who did not respond well to two different antidepressants.

Both treatments were combined with psychotherapy.

89 people with depression who hadn’t improved with at least two previous treatments took part.
They were randomly assigned to either TMS or a new antidepressant.
The treatment lasted eight weeks.
TMS involved 25 sessions of magnetic stimulation.
The medication group switched to a new antidepressant following standard guidelines.

The primary outcome measure was the degree of improvement in depression symptoms.

TMS was more effective than switching medications. More people responded well to MS (38% vs 15%) and more people’s depression went into remission with TMS (27% vs 5%).

TMS was better at improving symptoms of anxiety and lack of enjoyment (anhedonia)

Both treatments were equally effective for improving sleep, overthinking, and negative thought patterns. People’s expectations about their treatment were linked to how much their depression improved.

In conclusion, for people with depression that hasn’t responded well to a couple of medication attempts, TMS might be a more effective option than trying another antidepressant. The study also suggests that the choice between TMS and medication might depend on which specific symptoms a person struggles with most.

We started using TMS for people with migraine headaches if they do not respond to multiple standard therapies. About half of these patients respond well. However, we do not have large controlled trials to confirm that TMS effectively treats migraines.

If you are healthcare provider, attend the annual meeting of the Headache Cooperative of the Northeast

By: Dr. Mauskop

10-02-2024

Alternative Therapies, Blocks, Botox, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Head trauma, Headache medications, Headaches, injections, Migraine, neurostimulation, Psychology of headaches

I am once again honored to participate in the annual meeting of the Headache Cooperative of the Northeast to be held March 7-9 at the Stamford Marriott Hotel and Spa in Stamford, CT.

You will get a chance to learn about the latest scientific breakthroughs from Rami Burstein, president of the International Headache Society. You will also hear from other prominent figures in the field, renowned for their pioneering work and extensive contributions over several decades – Drs. Steven Baskin, Elizabeth Loder, Thomas Ward, Morris Levin, Richard Lipton, Steven Silberstein, Allan Purdy, Alan Rapaport, Paul Rizzoli, Sait Ashina, and others.

Meditation can be harmful

By: Dr. Mauskop

26-11-2023

Alternative Therapies, Chronic migraine, Migraine, Psychology of headaches

I tell most of my patients that after physical exercise, meditation is the second-best preventive treatment for migraine headaches.

It turns out that meditation is not an unalloyed good. In a recent podcast, Tim Ferris interviews a psychologist, Dr. Willoughby Britton whose research is devoted to the negative effects of meditation. Tim Ferris describes his experience of going on a week-long silent meditation retreat, while also fasting and taking psychedelic mushrooms. It is not too surprising that Tim Ferris ended up needing professional help. However, even meditation alone, if taken to an extreme can cause psychological problems. In California, the joke is that meditation is a competitive sport.

Dr. Britton and her colleagues identified a staggering 59 different symptoms that can be triggered by meditation. Cheetah House, an organization led by Dr. Britton, is dedicated to assisting individuals who have experienced negative effects from meditation. According to one study, the most common adverse effects are anxiety, traumatic re-experiencing, and heightened emotional sensitivity. Those with a history of adverse childhood experiences are at a higher risk. But surprisingly, even individuals with adverse effects reported being glad they had meditated.

Dr. Britton suggests that meditating for less than 30 minutes is not likely to result in negative effects.

I have been meditating for years, and it was only when I extended my meditation time to 45 minutes about a year ago that my migraines completely stopped. Fortunately, I have not encountered any side effects.

New Daily Persistent Headache is very treatable

By: Dr. Mauskop

09-10-2023

Alternative Therapies, Botox, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Headache medications, Headaches, injections, Migraine, New treatments, Psychology of headaches, Science of Migraine

New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is condition that is defined solely by the fact that the headache begins suddenly one day and does not go away. There are no scientific studies to suggest possible underlying mechanisms or treatments. Some patients develop it after a viral infection while others, after a period of stress and many with no apparent trigger.

In my latest book, I mentioned how a seemingly benign idea of classifying medical conditions can cause harm. In case of NDPH, many anecdotal reports in medical journals indicate that this condition is not responsive to treatment. However, there are no controlled double-blind studies, only anecdotal reports. Many patients with this condition will look up this literature and conclude that there is no hope of getting better. I have seen many such devastated people. But this bleak picture is clearly wrong.

I have seen many patients with NDPH who responded to various treatments. In my 30 years of using Botox, I have found it to be one of the safest and most effective treatments for NDPH as well as migraine and other types of headaches.

At the recent meeting of the International Headache Society held in Seoul, two presentations described good responses of NDPH to Botox injections.

The first report was by S. Cheema and colleagues of Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. They compared patients with NDPH (58) and those with chronic migraine (CM) with daily attacks (153) and chronic migraines without daily attacks (85). There was a 30% reduction in mean moderate and severe headache days in 33% of patients with NDPH, 43% with daily CM and 55% with non-daily CM.

The second report was by Shuu-Jiun Wang and colleagues of the Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital. They looked at the response of patients with NDPH who had predominately migraine features and those who had predominantly features of tension-type headaches. Of 228 patients diagnosed with NDPH, 199 patients (87%) had migrainous features and 29 patients (13%) had tension-type features. Their conclusion: “Through a mean follow-up duration of 2.5 years, around 40% patients with NDPH showed a favorable outcome at our headache center. Our results suggest NDPH might not be as grave as previously reported.”

Yes, these were also anecdotal reports rather than controlled trials, but they clearly show what I have also observed in my practice – NDPH is a very treatable condition. Hopefully, the next, fourth edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders will no longer list NDPH as a diagnosis since it has no scientific basis.

Anxiety may facilitate transformation of pain from acute to chronic

By: Dr. Mauskop

07-09-2023

Alternative Therapies, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Headaches, Migraine, Pain, Pain Research, Psychology of headaches, Science of Migraine

Our thoughts and emotions can impact the development of chronic pain. However, there haven’t been many studies exploring what causes pain to transition from being short-term (acute) to long-lasting (chronic).

Australian researchers conducted a study to investigate how our thought patterns, anxiety related to pain, and the tendency to avoid pain affect both acute and chronic pain. They conducted two studies for this purpose. In the first study, they interviewed 85 individuals experiencing long-term pain to understand their thoughts and emotions. In the second study, they observed 254 individuals who had recently started experiencing acute pain and followed up with them three months later.

In both studies, they examined interpretation bias using a word association task and assessed pain-related anxiety, pain avoidance, pain intensity, and how pain interfered with daily life. In both cases, they discovered that the way people think about pain was linked to how much it disrupted their daily lives. In the second study, they also found that people’s thought patterns about pain were connected to increased anxiety about pain. This heightened anxiety, in turn, made the pain more severe and disruptive after three months. While anxiety about pain also led people to try to avoid it, this avoidance behavior didn’t seem to affect the level of pain they experienced later on.

This research provides valuable insights into how pain can transition from acute to chronic. It suggests that our initial thoughts about pain might trigger anxiety related to pain, which can contribute to the pain persisting and becoming more troublesome over time. This finding could be crucial in developing strategies to prevent chronification of pain by addressing how people perceive and manage their anxiety about pain during its early stages. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, meditation, and other mind-body techniques could be some of such strategies.

Controlled trial of meditation for migraines

By: Dr. Mauskop

17-07-2023

Alternative Therapies, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Headaches, Migraine, Psychology of headaches

Meditation had a dramatic effect on my migraine headaches, especially when I increased my daily meditation time from 20 to 45 minutes. I have found that sumatriptan has always been very effective and migraines have never disrupted my daily life, even when I experienced prolonged periods of daily headaches. Because of meditation I hardly ever need to take sumatriptan. My personal experience and that of many of my patients align with the viewpoint of a small group of headache specialists who believe that triptans do not cause medication overuse headaches.

Mindfulness has been gaining a lot of attention as a potential way to manage migraines, but there haven’t been many scientific studies to support this. A group of Italian researchers investigated whether a specific mindfulness-based treatment, consisting of six sessions of mindfulness practice and daily self-practice, would be effective when added to the usual treatment for patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headaches.

They conducted a study with 177 patients. Half of the participants received the usual treatment alone, which included withdrawing from overused medications, education on proper medication use and lifestyle, and tailored prevention. The other half received the usual treatment plus the mindfulness-based intervention.

They looked at various factors to assess the effectiveness of the mindfulness-based treatment, including headache frequency, medication intake, quality of life, disability, depression and anxiety, sensitivity to touch, awareness of inner states, work-related difficulties, and disease-related costs.

After analyzing the data, they found that the patients who received the mindfulness-based treatment in addition to the usual treatment had better outcomes. They were more likely to achieve a significant reduction in headache frequency compared to their baseline (at least 50% reduction), and they also showed improvements in other areas such as quality of life, disability, headache impact, productivity loss due to headaches, medication intake, and healthcare costs.

They concluded that adding a six-session mindfulness-based treatment, along with daily self-practice, to the usual treatment is more effective than the usual treatment alone for patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headaches.

Effects of observational learning on placebo responses, or why sham remedies seem to work so well

By: Dr. Mauskop

19-06-2023

Alternative Therapies, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Pain, Pain Research, Psychology of headaches

Many companies selling ineffective treatments for painful conditions manage to attract a large customer base by showcasing testimonials from satisfied customers. Recent research suggests that these individuals might genuinely benefit from hearing others express positive experiences.

A study published in the journal Pain, titled “Learning pain from others: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on placebo hypoalgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia induced by observational learning” explores the impact of observational learning on placebo and nocebo responses.

Placebo hypoalgesia refers to when a fake treatment (placebo) reduces pain, while nocebo hyperalgesia is when the placebo actually increases pain. Learning processes, such as classical conditioning and operant conditioning, have been shown to play a role in these effects. Verbal suggestions and observational learning from others also influence placebo and nocebo responses. However, the magnitude of these effects can vary depending on the specific learning process used.

This meta-analysis of 17 studies showed that observational learning can effectively modulate pain and pain expectancies. However, the magnitude of these effects varies across studies. Observing a model in person resulted in larger effects compared to observing a videotaped model. The analysis also suggested that placebo effects can be induced through observational learning, but nocebo effects were not consistently observed. Empathy, specifically the empathic concern component, was found to be associated with the magnitude of observational learning effects.

The article concludes that observational learning can indeed influence pain experience and pain expectancies. Further studies possibly could lead to methods to enhance the treatment effects of proven therapies.

PTSD biomarkers

By: Dr. Mauskop

12-06-2023

Alternative Therapies, Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Head trauma, Headaches, post-traumatic headache, Psychology of headaches

Researchers have identified four blood biomarkers that show promise in predicting, diagnosing, and monitoring treatment response for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). These biomarkers could lead to more accurate methods of screening for PTSD, allowing for early intervention and prevention strategies. Additionally, they could help monitor treatment progress, identify different subtypes of PTSD, and enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disorder.

The study was conducted by the PTSD Systems Biology Consortium, initiated by the Department of Defense, and involved approximately 45 researchers. The team analyzed blood samples from 1,000 active-duty Army personnel from the Fort Campbell Cohort (FCC), who were assessed before and after deployment to Afghanistan in 2014.

The researchers focused on four biomarkers: glycolytic ratio, arginine, serotonin, and glutamate. They categorized the participants into four groups based on their PTSD symptoms, resilience levels, and clinical assessments. The findings revealed that individuals with PTSD or subthreshold PTSD had higher glycolytic ratios and lower arginine levels compared to those with high resilience. Additionally, participants with PTSD exhibited lower serotonin and higher glutamate levels. These associations were independent of factors such as age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and caffeine consumption.

The study results require further validation. The researchers also aim to determine the optimal time to screen soldiers for PTSD, considering the psychological challenges that arise around 2 to 3 months post-deployment. Moreover, they recognize the need for gender-specific biomarkers to improve the clinical assessment of female soldiers, given the increasing number of women serving in combat roles.

Ultimately, these findings may apply to the civilian population experiencing PTSD.

Antidepressant use during pregnancy

By: Dr. Mauskop

30-04-2023

Brain disorders, Chronic migraine, Headache medications, Headaches, Headaches in children, Migraine, Pain, Psychology of headaches

Antidepressants are commonly prescribed to treat migraines, tension-type headaches, and various types of chronic pain. Migraines primarily affect women of reproductive age, and those who suffer from migraines are more likely to develop anxiety and depression compared to those without migraines. This may be another reason why someone with migraines might be prescribed an antidepressant. Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant are understandably cautious about taking any medication.

Antidepressant use during pregnancy does not increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children, according to a new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

Antidepressant use during pregnancy has been associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in children in some studies. However, other factors such as the parent’s mental health status, genetics, and environmental factors may have influenced these results. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between antidepressant use in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children.

The study looked at data from over 3 million pregnancies, tracking children from birth until outcome diagnosis, disenrollment, death, or the end of the study (maximum 14 years). There were 145,702 antidepressant-exposed pregnancies.

The study found no evidence to suggest that antidepressant use in pregnancy itself increases the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, specific learning disorders, developmental speech/language disorders, developmental coordination disorders, intellectual disabilities, or behavioral disorders.

However, given the strong crude associations found in previous studies, antidepressant exposure during pregnancy may be an important marker for the need for early screening and intervention to modify factors that do increase such risk.

How to reduce pain recollection

By: Dr. Mauskop

24-04-2023

Brain disorders, Headaches, Migraine, Pain, Pain Research, Psychology of headaches

A recent study published in the journal Pain showed that adding a non-painful stimulus at the end of a Pap smear can reduce pain recollection. The study, titled “Adding a Nonpainful End to Reduce Pain Recollection of Pap Smear Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” was conducted by Taiwanese researchers and involved 266 women.

The study involved an intervention group that received a modified Pap test, where the operator kept the speculum still in the vagina for an additional 15 seconds after rotating it back, instead of immediately removing it. Participants in the modified Pap test group were unaware of this additional step, as they were behind a privacy curtain.

The outcomes of the study included recalled pain after Pap smear screening, real-time pain, and 1-year willingness to receive further Pap tests. Among 266 subjects, the modified Pap group experienced lower 5-minute recalled pain than the traditional Pap group on a 1 to 5 numeric scale and on a 0 to 10 visual analog scale. Subgroup analyses showed that these results were not affected by predicted pain, demographic, or socioeconomic characteristics, but it was more apparent in postmenopausal women. Additionally, the modified Pap test attenuated 1-year recalled pain on both pain scales and increased the 1-year willingness grade to receive further Pap tests.

This technique could potentially be applied to many other painful procedures, including Botox injections, blood draws, vaccine injections, dental procedures, and more.

Using AI to predict who will respond to placebo

By: Dr. Mauskop

16-04-2023

Headache medications, Headaches, Pain, Pain Research, Psychology of headaches

Placebo response is a bane of clinical trials but it can be very helpful in practice. A team of American and Canadian researchers used AI to help identify predictors of the placebo response. The results were recently published in Pain, under the title, Predicting placebo analgesia in patients with chronic pain using natural language processing: a preliminary validation study.

Since they used AI for their study, I thought it would be fitting to use ChatGPT to edit their abstract for the lay public.

Patients with chronic pain often experience significant pain relief from placebos (inert pills), and this effect can last for days or even weeks. However, it’s still unclear whether we can reliably predict who will respond to placebo and how to do so. Previous research has shown that people who respond well to placebos tend to talk about their pain and their life in a certain way. In this study, the researchers looked at whether these language patterns can predict who will respond to a placebo before they even receive the treatment, and whether we can distinguish between people who will respond to a placebo versus a real drug.

To do this, they analyzed language patterns from patients with chronic back pain who received a placebo in one study and used this information to build a language model that could predict who would respond to a placebo in a separate study. They found that this language model was able to predict, before treatment, which patients would respond well to a placebo in the second study. These patients reported an average of 30% pain relief from the placebo, while those predicted to be non-responders only experienced a 3% reduction in pain. However, the model was not able to predict who would respond to a real pain medication or who would recover without treatment, suggesting that it specifically predicts response to placebos.

Overall, this study suggests that we may be able to use language patterns to predict who will respond to placebos, which could help researchers design better clinical trials and improve patient care.