My new book, The End of Migraines: 150 Ways to Stop Your Pain, was just published by Amazon. It is also available on Google Play and Kobo.
I am very grateful to all my colleagues who took the time to read the book and to provide advance praise for it.
This is a self-published book. This allows me to update it regularly and to set a very affordable price – the e-book version is only $3.95 and the paperback is $14.95. The e-book version has the advantage of having many hyperlinks to original articles and other resources.
If you read it, please write a brief review on Amazon or Google and spread the word about it.
Researchers in Cincinnati, OH led by Dr. Andrew Hershey reviewed information about the diagnosis, headache features, medication overuse, functional disability in a group of 1,170 children and adolescents with continuous headaches. They compared patients given the diagnosis of chronic migraine with those who were diagnosed as having new daily persistent headache.
The mean age was 14 and 79% of the group were girls. The authors reported that “The overwhelming majority of these youth had headaches with migrainous features, regardless of their clinical diagnosis. Most youth with continuous headache experienced severe migraine-related functional disability, regardless of diagnostic subgroup.”
They concluded that “Overall, youth with continuous chronic migraine and new daily persistent headache did not have clinically meaningful differences in headache features and associated disability. Findings suggest that chronic migraine and new daily persistent headache may be variants of the same underlying disease.”
Here is my take on NDPH adapted from the soon-to-be-released book, The End of Migraine: 150 Ways to Stop Your Pain:
New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is one of the dozens of types of headaches listed in the classification of headaches. This particular listing causes more harm than good. NDPH is defined by the single fact that the headache begins on a certain day and persists without a break. The classification says that NDPH may have features suggestive of either migraine or tension-type headache.
There are no parallels to NDPH in medicine. There is no new daily persistent asthma, or new daily persistent colitis, or any other “new daily” disease.
There does not appear to be any justification for having NDPH as a distinct condition. It does not have a typical clinical presentation and it has not led to any research or treatment. When you search for this condition on the internet, you will not find any effective treatment for it. The suffering of many patients is magnified by the loss of hope, worsening depression, and flagging will to live.
Most importantly, some patients with NDPH do respond to treatment. According to anecdotal reports and in my experience, Botox injections, intravenous magnesium, preventive drugs for migraines, and other treatments can be effective.
Read MoreIf you’ve never experienced a hangover headache, a group of Spanish researchers can tell you what it feels like. They set out to evaluate and characterize what the international headache classification calls the “delayed alcohol-induced headache”. Also known as a hangover headache. The results of their investigation were published in the leading neurology journal, Neurology.
They studied a group with a lot of experience in this area – university students. The students made a personal sacrifice for the sake of science and voluntarily consumed alcohol and experienced headache.
A total of 1,108 (!) participants were included (58% female, mean age 23 years, 41% with headache history). The mean alcohol intake was 158 grams. Spirits were consumed by 60% of the participants; beer was consumed by 41%, and wine was consumed by 18%.
The mean headache duration was 7 hours. The duration correlated with the total grams of alcohol consumed. The pain was bilateral in 85% of patients and predominantly frontal in location (43%). The pain was mostly moderate in intensity with pressing (60%) or pulsatile (39%) quality. It was aggravated by physical activity in 83% of participants. Criteria for a migraine diagnosis were fulfilled by 36%.
One interesting finding of the study is that 58% of students had a headache that was typical of one seen with low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. This raises the question of whether alcohol can indeed cause low CSF pressure.
It is an interesting question but I am not sure if further studies are warranted. It is probably better to spend the money on trying to reduce alcohol consumption.
Read MoreHaving given Botox injections to thousands of patients, I know that some patients tolerate pain better if they curse during the procedure.
A British psychologist Richard Stephens seems to have made a career out of studying the effect of cursing on pain. His first paper Swearing as a response to pain, appeared in 2009 in NeuroReport. It showed that swearing improves pain tolerance in volunteers whose hand was submerged in icy water. His next paper, which I mentioned in a post in 2011, Swearing as a Response to Pain—Effect of Daily Swearing Frequency was published in The Journal of Pain.
In this study, Stephens looked at the effect of repeated daily swearing on experimental pain. The volunteers were again subjected to pain by submerging their hand into icy water. And they again showed that swearing reduces pain. However, people who tended to swear frequently throughout the day had less of a pain-relieving effect than those who did not.
His latest paper, Swearing as a Response to Pain: Assessing Hypoalgesic Effects of Novel “Swear” Words, was just published in the Frontiers in Psychology. The authors show that made-up “swear” words are not as effective as the good old four-letter f-word.
The conclusion of this 6,500-word research paper suggests that there is still a lot more swearing …er … I mean, studying to be done on this subject. Whether this is a good use of the British taxpayers’ money is another matter. Is the ultimate goal to save the British National Health Service money by replacing pain medications with scientifically validated swear words?
Read MoreA group of American and Chinese researchers reported an objective way to diagnose migraine headaches using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The paper just published in Neurology used machine learning to examine differences between the brains of migraine sufferers, patients with chronic pain, and healthy controls.
MRI scans of migraine patients typically show normal brain structure. fMRI scans can visualize connections between different parts of the brain, or so-called connectome. The researchers discovered abnormal functional connectivity within the visual, default mode, sensorimotor, and frontal-parietal networks that allowed them to distinguish migraineurs from healthy controls with 93% sensitivity and 89% specificity. They verified the specificity of this diagnostic marker with new groups of migraineurs and patients with other chronic pain disorders (chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia) and demonstrated 78% sensitivity and 76% specificity for discriminating migraineurs from nonmigraineurs. They also found that the changes in the marker correlated with the changes in headache frequency in response to real acupuncture.
If confirmed, these findings could offer a very accurate way to diagnose migraine, rather than relying on subjective clinical description. This test could also allow for an objective way to test various new treatments. Because of the cost of fMRIs, it will be a long time before it becomes a routine clinical test. It is also possible that genetic testing and testing of blood samples for biochemical markers will lead to other accurate diagnostic tests and tests to predict responses to various therapies.
Read MoreIf you suffer from migraines you are at a higher risk of having certain other medical problems, or comorbidities. They are not the result of having migraines, nor do those condition cause migraines. Most likely, they may have common underlying genetic, environmental, or behavioral factors. You should be aware of this link because treatment choice may be affected by the presence of these comorbidities.
Here is the list of conditions more common in migraines: anxiety, asthma, bipolar disorder, chronic pain, depression, fibromyalgia, reflux (GERD, or heartburn), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), high cholesterol, hypertension, obesity, sleep apnea, TMJ syndrome. Having these coexisting diseases increases the risk of worsening (chronification) of migraines.
Migraine often coexists with another one or more painful conditions listed above – chronic pain (low back and other), fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and TMJ. One plausible explanation is that chronic pain of one type leads to an increased sensitivity of brain cells. This increased sensitivity is well documented and is called wind-up phenomenon. Fortunately, many treatments can address several pain syndromes at once. These include antidepressant drugs (amitriptyline, duloxetine, and other), cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise, and other.
One possible explanation for the coexistence of psychiatric disorders is that 40-60% of people with chronic pain have a history of physical, emotional, or sexual abuse and may suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Another cause could be that they share serotonin and other neurochemical disturbances in the brain. Here too, antidepressants or certain epilepsy drugs may address both migraines and mood disorders.
Reflux (GERD) often seen in migraine sufferers could be the result of taking too many anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen, aspirin, and naproxen. Many patients will treat their heartburn with drugs such as omeprazole (Prilosec), which after prolonged use can cause multiple vitamin deficiencies, which in turn can worsen migraines and cause other symptoms.
Migraine has an inflammatory component and obesity is known to be pro-inflammatory, which could explain this connection. Diabetes drug, metformin could be a useful drug for patients who have difficulty losing weight with diet and exercise alone.
Read More
At the biennial International Headache Congress held last week in Dublin a group of Italian researchers presented a paper, Relationship between severity of migraine and vitamin D deficiency: a case-control study.
They examined 3 groups of subjects: 116 patients with chronic migraine, 44 patients with episodic migraine, and 100 non-headache controls. Ninety-two migraine patients had vitamin D insufficiency (borderline low levels), whereas 40 had a clear vitamin D deficiency. They found a strong inverse correlation between vitamin D levels and the severity of attacks as well as migraine-related disability.
This is only a correlational study, meaning that it does not prove that taking vitamin D will help relieve migraines. However, several neurological disorders seem to be associated with low vitamin D levels, suggesting that vitamin D is very important for the normal functioning of the nervous system. So it makes sense to keep your vitamin D levels at least in the middle of normal range.
Read MoreRed wine is a common trigger for migraines, although we still don’t know the cause or why red wine is worse than white. I was just interviewed for this article in the WSJ along with my friend Mo Levin of the UCSF headache clinic.
Read MoreA typical migraine aura consists of a visual disturbance (partial loss of vision, flickering lights, zigzags, etc) which lasts 15 to 60 minutes and precedes the headache. Auras can also occur without a headache. Auras occurs in 15 to 20% of migraine sufferers and those who experience them have a slightly higher risk of strokes. The reason for this increased risk has remained unclear.
A study just published in Neurology suggests a possible explanation. The study followed 11,939 participants, of whom 426 reported migraines with visual aura, 1,090 migraine without visual aura, 1,018 non-migraine headache, and 9,405 had no headache. Over a 20-year follow-up period, 232 (15%) of 1,516 with migraine developed atrial fibrillation, a type of cardiac arrhythmia (irregular heart beat). Migraine with visual aura was associated with 1.3 times higher risk of atrial fibrillation compared to no headache as well as 1.4 times higher when compared to migraine without visual aura.
Atrial fibrillation is very common and carries a fivefold increase in the risk of stroke compared to those with normal heart rhythm. This risk is even higher in those who are older than 65 years, in women, those who have congestive heart failure, had a prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, hypertension, diabetes and vascular disease. You can’t do anything about your age or being a woman, but good control of hypertension and diabetes (and exercise, weight control, and not smoking) can lower this risk. Patients with atrial fibrillation are usually treated with an anticoagulant (blood thinner), such as apixaban (Eliquis), which can prevent strokes.
Read MoreCaffeine and opioid (narcotic) drugs, if taken regularly, are proven to worsen headaches. This will not come as a surprise to anyone drinking large amounts of coffee – skipping your morning cup will leave you with a headache. Taking too much Excedrin, Fioricet, or Percocet will also make you want to take these drugs more and more often and with diminishing relief. However, most neurologists and headache specialists believe that triptans (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, et al.) and NSAIDs (naproxen, ibuprofen, et al.) can also cause “medication overuse headaches”. This remains a belief, rather than a scientific fact and it leads to thousands of headache sufferers being unfairly accused of causing or worsening their own headaches. They are being denied a safe and effective treatment that could relieve their suffering and reduce disability. My most popular blog post that so far has elicited 247 comments, is one on the daily use of triptans.
Drs. Ann Scher of Uniformed Services University, Paul Rizzoli and Elizabeth Loder of Brigham and Women’s Hospital have just published an article in a leading neurology journal, Neurology, entitled, Medication overuse headache. An entrenched idea in need of scrutiny. Last year I described a debate on this topic between Dr. Scher and Dr. Richard Lipton of the Montefiore Headache Clinic at the meeting of the American Headache Society. The abstract of this new article can be easily understood by the lay public, so I am including its full text.
“It is a widely accepted idea that medications taken to relieve acute headache pain can paradoxically worsen headache if used too often. This type of secondary headache is referred to as medication overuse headache (MOH); previously used terms include rebound headache and drug-induced headache. In the absence of consensus about the duration of use, amount, and type of medication needed to cause MOH, the default position is conservative. A common recommendation is to limit treatment to no more than 10 or 15 days per month (depending on medication type) to prevent headache frequency progression. Medication withdrawal is often recommended as a first step in treatment of patients with very frequent headaches. Existing evidence, however, does not provide a strong basis for such causal claims about the relationship between medication use and frequent headache. Observational studies linking treatment patterns with headache frequency are by their nature confounded by indication. Medication withdrawal studies have mostly been uncontrolled and often have high dropout rates. Evaluation of this evidence suggests that only a minority of patients required to limit the use of symptomatic medication may benefit from treatment limitation. Similarly, only a minority of patients deemed to be overusing medications may benefit from withdrawal. These findings raise serious questions about the value of withholding or withdrawing symptom-relieving medications from people with frequent headaches solely to prevent or treat MOH. The benefits of doing so are smaller, and the harms larger, than currently recognized. The concept of MOH should be viewed with more skepticism. Until the evidence is better, we should avoid dogmatism about the use of symptomatic medication. Frequent use of symptom-relieving headache medications should be viewed more neutrally, as an indicator of poorly controlled headaches, and not invariably a cause.”
Read MoreMedical marijuana has been legalized in NY and more than 20 other states. It is approved in NY for several medical conditions, including pain and some of my patients with headaches (about one out of 3), arthritis, and other pains have found it to be very helpful. Some patients use it acutely (as a vaporizer or tincture) and report relief of pain, and/or nausea and for some it allows them to go to sleep and sleep off their migraines. Tablets of medical marijuana can prevent migraines if taken once or twice a day. Most people need products with a low THC/CBD ratio which does not cause euphoria or other cognitive effect.
Despite the requirement by states to have verified amounts of active ingredients, THC and CBD in the medical marijuana products, the efficacy and the side effects vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. This could be in part due to ingredients other than THC and CBD. Fortunately, many researchers are looking into the effect of pure ingredients and their mechanism of action.
Such a study was presented at the recent meeting of the American Headache Society by scientists from the Missouri State University led by Paul Durham. They developed a new animal model of migraine in rats and triggered a process in the rats’ brains that is similar to a migraine in humans. Administering cannabidiol (CBD) suppressed increased sensitivity in the trigeminal nerve and produced other positive effects, suggesting a possible mechanism by which CBD may relieve migraine and other facial pains. The next logical step would be to add small amounts of THC to see if it enhances the effect of CBD (so called entourage effect).
Read MoreEstrogen-based oral contraceptives are usually contraindicated for women who have migraines with aura. In the latest issue of the journal Headache, Dr. Anne Calhoun of the Carolina Headache Institute argues that this contraindication is no longer valid.
She analyzes research studies that consistently show that stroke risk is not increased with today’s very low dose combined hormonal contraceptives containing 20-25 µg ethinyl estradiol and that continuous ultra low-dose formulations (10-15 µg) may even reduce the frequency of migraine auras. The past prohibitions were mostly based on the risk associated with contraceptives containing over 30 µg and often 50 µg of estradiol.
We often use continuous contraception (not having a period for 3 to 12 months) in women with menstrually-related migraines, which usually are not accompanied by aura.
There is no doubt that the risk of strokes in women with migraines with aura who take oral contraceptives is significantly increased by smoking and other stroke risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, and other. So, women who have migraine with aura and take estrogen-based contraceptives should not smoke, should exercise regularly, have a healthy diet and have regular check-ups to detect conditions that may augment the risk of strokes. If such risk factors are present, progesterone-only or non-hormonal contraceptives should be used.
Dr. Calhoun also points out other benefits of oral contraceptives, besides the reduction of the chance of undesired pregnancy, relief of painful periods, excessive bleeding, acne, and PMS. These include reduction in death rate from any cause, 80% reduction in the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers and reduced risk of colorectal cancer. On the other hand, oral contraceptives do increase the risk of breast cancer.
Read More
Recent Comments